SPIEDL Logo

GENERAL INFORMATION

Electric and magnetic dipolar response of germanium nanospheres: interference effects, scattering anisotropy, and optical forces

J. Nanophoton. 5, 053512 (Jun 29, 2011); http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3603941

Raquel Gómez-Medina, Irene Suárez-Lacalle, and Juan José Sáenz

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Departamento de Física de la Materia Condensada, 28049 Madrid, Spain

Manuel Nieto-Vesperinas

Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid, C.S.I.C., Campus de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain

Braulio García-Cámara, Francisco González, and Fernando Moreno

Universidad de Cantabria, Departamento de Física Aplicada, Avda. de los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Spain

The coherent combination of electric and magnetic responses is the basis of the electromagnetic behavior of new engineered metamaterials. The basic constituents of their meta-atoms usually have metallic character and consequently high absorption losses. Based on standard “Mie” scattering theory, we found that there is a wide window in the near-infrared (wavelengths 1 to 3 μm), where light scattering by lossless submicrometer Ge spherical particles is fully described by their induced electric and magnetic dipoles. The interference between electric and magnetic dipolar fields is shown to lead to anisotropic angular distributions of scattered intensity, including zero backward and almost zero forward scattered intensities at specific wavelengths, which until recently was theoretically established only for hypothetically postulated magnetodielectric spheres. Although the scattering cross section at zero backward or forward scattering is exactly the same, radiation pressure forces are a factor of 3 higher in the zero forward condition.

© 2011 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)

History
Received Apr 17, 2011
Accepted Jun 03, 2011
Revised May 21, 2011
Published online Jun 29, 2011
Citation
Raquel Gómez-Medina, Braulio García-Cámara, Irene Suárez-Lacalle, Francisco González, Fernando Moreno, Manuel Nieto-Vesperinas and Juan José Sáenz, "Electric and magnetic dipolar response of germanium nanospheres: interference effects, scattering anisotropy, and optical forces", J. Nanophoton. 5, 053512 (Jun 29, 2011); http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3603941

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE

OPEN ACCESS

FULL-TEXT OPTIONS:

RELATED CONTENT

More Like This Article


  1. C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman , Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1983) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.72.193103.
  2. E. M. Purcell and C. R. Pennypacker, “Scattering and absorption of light by nonspherical dielectric grains,” Astrophys. J. 186, 705–714 (1973).
  3. S. Oldenburg, R. Averitt, S. Westcott, and N. Halas, “Nanoengineering of optical resonances,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 288(2–4), 243–247 (1998).
  4. P. K. Jain, X. Huang, I. H. El-Sayed, and M. A. El-Sayed, “Noble metals on the nanoscale: Optical and photothermal properties and some applications in imaging, sensing, biology, and medicine,” Acc. Chem: Res. 41, 1578–1586 (2008). [MEDLINE]
  5. A. Alù and N. Engheta, “The quest for magnetic plasmons at optical frequencies,” Opt. Express 17, 5723–5130 (2009).
  6. A. Alù and N. Engheta, “Dynamical theory of artificial optical magnetism produced by rings of plasmonic nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. B 78, 085112 (2008).
  7. N. A. Mirin and N. J. Halas, “Light-bending nanoparticles,” Nano Lett. 9, 1255–1259 (2009). [MEDLINE]
  8. K. Huang, M. Povinelli, and J. Joannopoulos, “Negative effective permeability in polaritonic photonic crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 543–545 (2004)APPLAB000085000004000543000001. [ISI]
  9. C. Holloway, E. Kuester, J. Baker-Jarvis, and P. Kabos, “A double negative (dng) composite medium composed of magnetodielectric spherical particles embedded in a matrix,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat. 51(10), 2596–2603 (2003).
  10. O. Vendik and M. Gashinova , “Artificial double negative (dng) media composed by two different dielectric sphere lattices embedded in a dielectric matrix,” 34th European Microwave Conference, Amsterdam 2004 (Horizon House Publications Ltd., Norwood, MA), Vol. 3, pp. 1209–1212 (2005).
  11. M. Wheeler, J. Aitchison, and M. Mojahedi, “Three-dimensional array of dielectric spheres with an isotropic negative permeability at infrared frequencies,” Phys. Rev. B 72, 193103 (2005).
  12. V. Yannopapas and A. Moroz, “Negative refractive index metamaterials from inherently non-magnetic materials for deep infrared to terahertz frequency ranges,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, 3717–3734 (2005). [ISI]
  13. A. Ahmadi and H. Mosallaei, “Physical configuration and performance modeling of all-dielectric metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. B 77, 045104 (2008).
  14. M. Wheeler, J. Aitchison, J. Chen, G. Ozin, and M. Mojahedi, “Infrared magnetic response in a random silicon carbide micropowder,” Phys. Rev. B 79, 073103 (2009).
  15. L. Jylhä, I. Kolmakov, S. Maslovski, and S. Tretyakov, “Modeling of isotropic backward-wave materials composed of resonant spheres,” J. Appl. Phys. 99, 043102 (2006)JAPIAU000099000004043102000001.
  16. L. Peng, L. Ran, H. Chen, H. Zhang, J. Kong, and T. Grzegorczyk, “Experimental observation of left-handed behavior in an array of standard dielectric resonators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 157403 (2007). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
  17. J. Schuller, R. Zia, T. Taubner, and M. Brongersma, “Dielectric metamaterials based on electric and magnetic resonances of silicon carbide particles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 107401 (2007). [MEDLINE]
  18. K. Vynck, D. Felbacq, E. Centeno, A. Cuabuz, D. Cassagne, and B. Guizal, “All-dielectric rod-type metamaterials at optical frequencies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 133901 (2009). [MEDLINE]
  19. T. G. Mackay, “Lewin's homogenization formula revisited for nanocomposite materials,” J. Nanophoton. 2, 029503 (2008).
  20. M. Kerker, D. Wang, and G. Giles, “Electromagnetic scattering by magnetic spheres,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73, 765–767 (1983). [ISI]
  21. U. Leonhardt, “Optical conformal mapping,” Science 312, 1777–1780 (2006). [MEDLINE]
  22. J. Pendry, D. Schurig, and D. Smith, “Controlling electromagnetic fields,” Science 312, 1780–1782 (2006). [MEDLINE]
  23. A. Alù and N. Engheta, “How does zero forward-scattering in magnetodielectric nanoparticles comply with the optical theorem?,” J. Nanophoton. 4, 041590 (2010)JNOACQ000004000001041590000001.
  24. A. Lakhtakia, V. K. Varadan, and V. V. Varadan, “Reflection and transmission of plane waves at the planar interface of a general uniaxial medium and free space,” J. Mod. Optics 38, 649–657 (1991).
  25. B. García-Cámara, F. Moreno, F. González, and O. J. F. Martin, “Light scattering by an array of electric and magnetic nanoparticles,” Opt. Express 18, 10001–10015 (2010).
  26. S. Albaladejo, R. Gómez-Medina, L. S. Froufe-Pérez, H. Marinchio, R. Carminati, J. F. Torrado, G. Armelles, A. García-Martín, and J. J. Sáenz, “Radiative corrections to the polarizability tensor of an electrically small anisotropic dielectric particle,” Opt. Express 18, 3556–3567 (2010).
  27. V. V. Temnov, G. Armelles, U. Woggon, D. Guzatov, A. Cebollada, A. García-Martín, J.-M. García-Martín, T. Thomay, A. Leitenstorfer, and R. Bratschitsch, “Active magneto-plasmonics in hybrid metalferromagnet structures,” Nature Photon. 4, 107–111 (2010).
  28. M. Nieto-Vesperinas, J. J. Sáenz, R. Gómez-Medina, and L. Chantada, “Optical forces on small magnetodielectric particles,” Opt. Express 18, 11428–11443 (2010).
  29. M. Nieto-Vesperinas, R. Gómez-Medina, and J. J. Sáenz, “Angle-suppressed scattering and optical forces on submicrometer dielectric particles,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28, 54–60 (2011). [MEDLINE]
  30. A. E. Miroshnichenko, “Non-Rayleigh limit of the Lorenz-Mie solution and suppression of scattering by spheres of negative refractive index,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 013808 (2009).
  31. B. García-Cámara, F. Moreno, F. González, J. M. Saiz, and G. Videen, “Light scattering resonances in small particles with electric and magnetic properties,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25, 327–34 (2008). [MEDLINE]
  32. A. Evlyukhin, C. Reinhardt, A. Seidel, B. Luk'yanchuk, and B. Chichkov, “Optical response features of Si-nanoparticle arrays,” Phys. Rev. B 82(4), 045404 (2010).
  33. A. García-Etxarri, R. Gómez-Medina, L. S. Froufe-Pérez, C. López, L. Chantada, F. Scheffold, J. Aizpurua, M. Nieto-Vesperinas, and J. J. Sáenz, “Strong magnetic response of submicrometer silicon particles in the infrared,” Opt. Express 19, 4815–4826 (2011).
  34. R. Gómez-Medina, M. Nieto-Vesperinas, and J. J. Sáenz, “Nonconservative electric and magnetic optical forces on submicrometer dielectric particles,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 033825 (2011).
  35. E. D. Palik , Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, Academic Press, Orlando, Florida (1985).
  36. P. Chaumet and A. Rahmani, “Electromagnetic force and torque on magnetic and negative-index scatterers,” Opt. Express 17(4), 2224–2234 (2009). [MEDLINE]
  37. G. Volpe, R. Quidant, G. Badenes, and D. Petrov, “Surface plasmon radiation forces,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 238101 (2006). [MEDLINE]
  38. S. Albaladejo, M. I. Marqués, F. Scheffold, and J. J. Sáenz, “Giant enhanced diffusion of gold nanoparticles in optical vortex fields,” Nano Lett. 9, 3527–3531 (2009).
  39. S. Albaladejo, M. I. Marqués, M. Laroche, and J. J. Sáenz, “Scattering forces from the curl of the spin angular momentum of a light field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 113602 (2009). [MEDLINE]
  40. R. Gómez-Medina, P. S. José, A. García-Martín, M. Lester, M. Nieto-Vesperinas, and J. J. Sáenz, “Resonant radiation pressure on neutral particles in a waveguide,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4275–4277 (2001). [ISI] [MEDLINE]

Close

close