Ms. Maud E.H. Ophelders Profile

Maud E.H. Ophelders

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (1)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 4 April 2022 Presentation + Paper

Assessment of manual and automated intracranial artery diameter measurements

I. Vos, M. E. Ophelders, Y. Ruigrok, B. Velthuis, H. Kuijf

Proceedings Volume 12035, 1203504 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2611777

KEYWORDS: Arteries, Aneurysms, Visualization, Statistical analysis, Magnetic resonance angiography, Image segmentation, Error analysis, Radiology, Principal component analysis, Neurology

Read Abstract +

Automated quantification of intracranial artery morphology facilitates the identification of risk predictors for aneurysm development, as well as the detection of aneurysms. One established risk factor is the diameter of intracranial arteries which are arranged in a circulatory anastomosis, called the Circle of Willis (CoW). In this work, we assessed the performance of manual and automated measurement of intracranial artery diameters. Au- tomated measurements were obtained using a full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) approach. We investigated intra-and inter-rater variability, and compared manual to automatically obtained diameter measurements. The displacement error of manual measurement was assessed as another source of intra-rater variation. We used Bland–Altman plots and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for analysis. Overall, the assessment revealed acceptable variation in intra- and inter-rater variability with no proportional bias. The median displacement error for repeated manual measurements (intra-rater) was 0.55 mm (IQR 0.24 – 1.06 mm). Good agreement was found between manual and automated measurements, with an ICC value of 0.76 (p<0.05, Pearson). These findings have implications for future assessment of intracranial artery diameters.

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on SPIE.org.

ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.

Organizational Username

Organizational Password

Show/Hide Password

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years