This article presents a comparative study between a well-known SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping)
algorithm, called Gmapping, and a standard Dead-Reckoning algorithm; the study is based on experimental results
of both approaches by using a commercial skid-based turning robot, P3DX. Five main base-case scenarios are
conducted to evaluate and test the effectiveness of both algorithms. The results show that SLAM outperformed the
Dead Reckoning in terms of map-making accuracy in all scenarios but one, since SLAM did not work well in a
rapidly changing environment. Although the main conclusion about the excellence of SLAM is not surprising, the
presented test method is valuable to professionals working in this area of mobile robots, as it is highly practical, and
provides solid and valuable results. The novelty of this study lies in its simplicity. The simple but novel test method
for quantitatively comparing robot mapping algorithms using SLAM and Dead Reckoning and some applications
using autonomous robots are being patented by the authors in U.S. Patent Application Nos. 13/400,726 and
13/584,862.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.