Presentation
9 March 2020 Comparison between two handheld quantitative micro elastography methods (Conference Presentation)
Qi Fang, Luke Frewer, Renate Zilkens, Lixin Chin, Ken Y. Foo, Rowan Sanderson, Devina Lakhiani, James D. Anstie, Ben F. Dessauvagie, Bruce Latham, Christobel M. Saunders, Brendan F. Kennedy
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
This presentation reports a comparison between two handheld quantitative micro elastography (QME) methods: PZT actuated compression QME and manual compression QME. PZT actuated compression QME utilizes a PZT actuator to provide a periodic compression against the scanned sample, whilst manual compression QME utilizes the continuous motion of the user’s hand holding the probe to create compression against the sample. From our results, each method has its own advantages, and both methods are capable of measuring elasticity of the sample and distinguishing stiff tumor from regions of soft benign tissue on excised human breast specimens.
Conference Presentation
© (2020) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Qi Fang, Luke Frewer, Renate Zilkens, Lixin Chin, Ken Y. Foo, Rowan Sanderson, Devina Lakhiani, James D. Anstie, Ben F. Dessauvagie, Bruce Latham, Christobel M. Saunders, and Brendan F. Kennedy "Comparison between two handheld quantitative micro elastography methods (Conference Presentation)", Proc. SPIE 11242, Optical Elastography and Tissue Biomechanics VII, 1124210 (9 March 2020); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2549443
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Ferroelectric materials

Elastography

Tissues

Actuators

Breast

Mammography

Optical coherence tomography

Back to Top