Chris Anderson,1 Arnaud Allezy,1 Weilun Chao,1 Lucas Conley,2 Carl Cork,1 Will Cork,1 Rene Delano,1 Jason DePonte,1 Michael Dickinson,1 Geoff Gaines,1 Jeff Gamsby,1 Eric Gulliksonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0337-7674,1 Gideon Jones,1 Lauren McQuade,2 Ryan Miyakawa,1 Patrick Naulleau,1 Seno Rekawa,1 Farhad Salmassi,1 Brandon Vollmer,1 Daniel Zehm,1 Wenhua Zhu1
1Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (United States) 2Inpria Corp. (United States)
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
Vibration levels in MET5 exposures were reduced from 1.5 nm RMS to 0.8 nm RMS by tuning the vibration isolation system and removing non-compliant hardware. Frequency doubling exposures were improved by replacing the Fourier synthesis pupil scanner mirror. Focus-exposure-matrix outliers have been solved by patching a bug in the control software. 9 nm half-pitch lines and 8 nm half-pitch lines were printed in 11 nm thick MOx resist.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Chris Anderson, Arnaud Allezy, Weilun Chao, Lucas Conley, Carl Cork, Will Cork, Rene Delano, Jason DePonte, Michael Dickinson, Geoff Gaines, Jeff Gamsby, Eric Gullikson, Gideon Jones, Lauren McQuade, Ryan Miyakawa, Patrick Naulleau, Seno Rekawa, Farhad Salmassi, Brandon Vollmer, Daniel Zehm, Wenhua Zhu, "How we are making the 0.5-NA Berkeley mirco-field exposure tool stable and productive," Proc. SPIE 11323, Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography XI, 113230B (23 March 2020); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2552125