Don J. Nocumhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4194-7287,1,2 John Robinson,2 Mark Halaki,2 Magnus Båth,3,4 Nejc Mekiš,5 Eisen Liang,1 Nadine Thompson,1,2 Michelle Moscova,6 Warren Reed2
1Sydney Adventist Hospital (Australia) 2The Univ. of Sydney (Australia) 3Univ. of Gothenburg (Sweden) 4Sahlgrenska Univ. Hospital (Sweden) 5Univ. of Ljubljana (Slovenia) 6Univ. of New South Wales (Australia)
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
Visual grading characteristic (VGC) analysis was used to investigate the performance of interventional radiologists and interventional radiographers when assessing uterine artery embolisation (UAE) image quality. The observers rated the image quality of 20 randomised DSA (digital subtraction angiography) series using a five-point rating scale, which compared Group A (optimised UAE radiation dose; n = 50) with a reference Group B (control group; n = 50). VGC analysis resulted in an area under the VGC curve (AUCVGC) of 0.52 for interventional radiologists (P = 0.83) and 0.55 for interventional radiographers (P = 0.61). Radiation dose reduction had no effect on observer image quality assessments.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Don J. Nocum, John Robinson, Mark Halaki, Magnus Båth, Nejc Mekiš, Eisen Liang, Nadine Thompson, Michelle Moscova, Warren Reed, "Visual grading characteristic (VGC) analysis of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) image quality assessment by interventional radiologists and interventional radiographers," Proc. SPIE 12035, Medical Imaging 2022: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 120350I (4 April 2022); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2612548