|
1.INTRODUCTIONWith the continuous expansion of production scale and deepening of development level in a certain well area, some problems have gradually been exposed in production capacity construction and production: (1) Strong heterogeneity of gas reservoirs, large differences in single well production dynamics, and unbalanced exploitation seriously restrict the stable production capacity of gas reservoirs; (2) The degree of reserve utilization in the well area is low, the physical properties of the gas well reservoir are poor, the energy is insufficient, and the production dynamics such as pressure and production capacity change quickly. It is necessary to timely track and evaluate the dynamic characteristics of gas reservoir development and formulate reasonable development technology countermeasures; (3) The gas water relationship in gas reservoirs is complex, and the wellbore of gas wells is prone to liquid accumulation. During the development process, attention should be paid to drainage1-3. Therefore, it is necessary to timely evaluate the development performance of gas reservoirs, summarize the implementation experience of measures in the well network, combine the actual production performance of gas wells, reservoir conditions, process technology and other aspects, select potential wells for the next step of measures, thereby improving single well production capacity, enhancing development efficiency, and increasing reserve utilization4. 2.OVERVIEW OF THE WELL AREA2.1Structure, reservoir and gas reservoir characteristicsA certain well area is located in the Xujiaweizi fault depression in the southeastern part of the Songliao Basin, with a Shengping Xingcheng nose shaped structure. It mainly produces volcanic and conglomerate rocks, with explosive and fan delta facies as the main lithofacies. The lithology is mainly rhyolite, tuff, conglomerate, and sandstone. The reservoir belongs to a medium low porosity and low permeability reservoir, with poor physical properties. The gas water relationship in the well area is complex, and it belongs to a normal pressure and temperature system. The natural gas properties are mainly methane, which is a typical dry gas feature. The formation water is NaHCO3 type. 2.2Development statusProduction time of a certain well area: Starting from July 2008; Total number of wells: 12; Average daily gas production per well: 6.3×104 m3; Average daily water production per well: 1.7 m3; Daily production capacity: 76×104 m3; Annual production capacity: 2.2×108 m3; Gas extraction speed: 4.7%; Accumulated gas production: 13.4×108 m3; Extraction degree: 28.3%. 3.DEVELOPING DYNAMIC ANALYSIS6 gas wells are produced from the initial stage of production from 2008 to 2014 in this area. As the production capacity of the gas wells naturally decreases, the daily gas production gradually decreases. Since 2015, some new wells have been put into production each year, and the daily gas production has been increasing year by year. The development situation is good (Figure 1). 3.1Capacity characteristicsDefine abbreviations and acronyms the first time they are used in the text, even after they have been defined in the abstract. Abbreviations such as IEEE, SI, MKS, CGS, sc, dc, and rms do not have to be defined. Do not use abbreviations in the title or heads unless they are unavoidable. The production capacity of gas wells varies greatly5, with a higher proportion of Class II gas wells (Table 1). Table 1.Gas well classification evaluation and composition.
The production characteristics are characterized by a rapid decrease in production capacity in the early stages of production6-7, which is currently stabilizing (Figure 2). 3.2Formation pressureThe formation pressure decreased rapidly in the initial stage of production and is currently stabilizing (Figure 3), while the gas production per unit pressure drop is relatively low (Figure 4). Pressure monitoring shows that there is a connectivity relationship between wells M6-101, M6-102, M6-202, and M603 (Figures 5 and 6). 3.3Reserve characteristicsThe dynamic reserves of single well control are low (Figure 7), and the degree of reserve utilization in the well area is low (Figure 8). 3.4Produced water characteristicsAt present, the main type of produced water in the well area is fracture type weak water channeling, with a water to gas ratio ranging from 0.1 to 0.9 m3/104 m3. Some gas wells have low production and are difficult to carry liquid. Currently, there are three wells producing layer water, all located in lower structural areas, adjacent to the same layer of gas and water (Table 2). Table 2.Production situation and water quality analysis of a certain well area.
4.POTENTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURESFor a certain well area, it is necessary to have a refined development strategy. From a planar perspective, the well network should be encrypted in the unused area. From a vertical perspective, the unused layer should be subjected to perforating and fracturing. From a refined perspective, the underutilized layer should be subjected to repeated fracturing, reservoir contamination wells should be unblocked, and liquid gas wells should be treated with composite drainage to improve single well productivity, enhance development efficiency, and increase reserve utilization. 4.1Well network encryptionFrom a planar perspective, the well network is encrypted for the unused area. A certain well area has strong heterogeneity in the reservoir and low degree of reserve utilization. By calculating the current well control area and remaining reserves between wells of the gas wells that have been put into operation (Table 3), the degree of reserve utilization can be improved by adjusting the well network encryption. The remaining reserves under well control between well groups are 5.1×108 m3, with an area of 0.51 km2. It is recommended to select a favorable location in the distribution area of remaining reserves and arrange a horizontal well to fully utilize the remaining reserves. Table 3.Calculation of single well control area in a certain well area.
4.2Perforation and fracturingVertically, for gas wells with unused reservoirs, perform perforation and fracturing, summarize the experience of implementing measures in the well network, and select potential wells for the next step of measures based on actual gas well production performance, reservoir conditions, process technology, and other aspects5-8 (Table 4). Table 4.Situation of unused reservoir gas wells in a well area.
The drilling and fracturing of the gravel layer in well M1-4 have achieved increased storage and production of the gas well. After the measures, the well’s controlled reserves have increased by 1×108 m3, and the initial production has reached 10×104 m3, with a cumulative increase of 2430×104 m3. The M6-308 well in the well area is used to extract the Shahezi Formation reservoir, while the adjacent M6-309 and М6-301 wells are used to extract the volcanic rock reservoir, which has good physical properties. From the perspective of production dynamics, the stable production capacity of M6-308 well is 6×104 m3/d, the daily production capacity of M6-301 well and M6-309 well are both above 10×104 m3, and the peak shaving capacity can reach 18×104 m3/d. The effective thickness of the unused volcanic rock reservoir in M6-308 well is 46.8 m, and it is predicted that the daily gas increase of the well after perforation and fracturing can reach 10.3×104 m3. It is predicted that the total increase in gas production through perforation and fracturing of unused reservoir gas wells in a certain well area is 86.2×104 m3/d (Table 5). Table 5.Prediction of gas increase in unused reservoir gas wells.
4.3Repeated fracturingIn terms of precision, for gas wells with inconsistent dynamics and insufficient reservoir utilization, repeated fracturing was carried out. The M6-Xiang201 and M6-102 wells were affected by edge and bottom water, with an average perforation of only 15.4% of the effective reservoir thickness. The amount of sand added was less than 50 m3, and the amount of liquid added was less than 400 m3. It is predicted that the effective thickness of the unused reservoir is 52.6 m (Table 6). Table 6.Insufficient utilization of gas wells in the edge and bottom water gas reservoir.
The M1 Ping 1 well underwent repeated fracturing to improve the degree of reservoir transformation. During the gas testing, only 44 m3 of sand was added, resulting in low fracturing fluid backflow rate and large leakage. In addition, there was a 448 m reservoir that was not used, and the daily gas production before the measures was only 3.2×104 m3. In order to improve the gas well production capacity, 13 stages of fracturing transformation were carried out in 2017, with a sand addition of 372 m3 and a liquid volume of 8260 m3. After the measures, the well control reserves increased by 2.6×108 m3, and the production increased by 6×104 m3. The cumulative gas increase has been 2808×104 m3. It is predicted that the total amount of gas increase from repeated fracturing in a gas well with insufficient reservoir utilization in a certain well area is 3.1×104 m3/d (Table 7). Table 7.Prediction of gas well increment for underutilized gas reservoirs in the edge and bottom water gas reservoirs.
4.4Reservoir unblockingThere is a discrepancy between the dynamic and static conditions, and there is reservoir contamination in the gas well. Reservoir unblocking is carried out, and the M6-102 well is adjacent to the same gas and water layer, producing below the critical liquid carrying flow rate. The wellbore is prone to liquid accumulation, with a large production pressure difference, and there is “water lock” pollution in the reservoir. From the perspective of production dynamics, the daily gas production and water production of the well are low, with low wellhead pressure and a recovery rate of 34.5%. The remaining well control reserves are 2.03×108 m3. It is recommended to perform reservoir unblocking on the well9. Taking the M6-103 well reservoir unblocking as an example, the daily production capacity of the well was low before the measure, and it could not continue normal production. After the measure, continuous production was achieved, with an initial daily gas production of 1.8×104 m3 and a daily water production of 5.3 m3. For reservoir unblocking wells (Table 8), timely acquisition of dynamic data, evaluation of production increase effect, summary of mature practices, identification of shortcomings, and reliable reference for the next batch of well measures are provided. It is predicted that the daily gas increase of M6-102 well after the measures will be 1.5×104 m3. Table 8.Statistical table of reservoir unblocking wells.
4.5Composite drainageIn terms of precision, for the liquid gas well, composite drainage is carried out. The physical properties of the reservoir in M6 Xie201 well are poor, the daily gas production during gas testing is low, and the skin coefficient reflects that the reservoir has no obvious pollution. Small layer data shows that there is no potential layer above and below. It is recommended to improve the recovery rate of the gas well by implementing composite drainage measures on this well10-12. M6-101 has eddy current tools underground, with a large pressure difference in the oil casing, up to 3.5 MPa, and the wellbore is prone to fluid accumulation. The control measures of adjusting production and carrying liquid are taken for the well. When the inlet pressure is below 6 MPa, the instantaneous production is increased by 1000-1500 m3/h until the inlet pressure rises to about 8 MPa and is adjusted to production allocation. Through the control, the cumulative gas increase of M6-101 well is 148.72×104 m3 so far, and it is predicted that the daily gas increase of M6-XE201 well combined drainage is 0.7×104 m3. 5.CONCLUSION
REFERENCESCao, B. and Gao, T.,
“Rational developing strategies of the volcanic gas reservoirs in block d of Xushen gasfield,”
Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 35 3
(2016). Google Scholar
Xiao, H., Li, M. and Zhang, B.,
“Study on unsteady seepage characteristics and production decline of tight channel sandstone gas reservoirs,”
in IOP Conference Series,Earth and Environmental Science,
486
–492
(2021). Google Scholar
Hu, N., He, D. and Guo, J.,
“Integrated development of horizontal Wells in tight sandstone gas reservoirs to improve oil recovery:A case study of Denglou Ku Gas reservoir in Changling Gas Field,”
Journal of Xi’an Petroleum University (Natural Science Edition), 36
(05), 55
–63
(2021). Google Scholar
Li, R., Dynamic Analysis of Oil and Gas Field Gas Reservoir and New Technology of Gas Well Stimulation and High Production, Petrochemical Press, Beijing
(2008). Google Scholar
Li, P., Fan, Q., Huo, M., Zheng, L. and Yue, J.,
“Research and application of relationship between production allocation and decline rate of gas wells in Sulige gas field,”
Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science&Technology Edition), 42 126
–132
(2019). Google Scholar
Arps, J. J.,
“Analysis of decline curves,”
Transactions of the AIME, 160
(1), 228
–247
(1945). https://doi.org/10.2118/945228-G Google Scholar
Fetkovich, M. J., Fetkovich, E. J. and Fetkovich, M. D.,
“Useful concepts for decline curve forecasting, reserve estimation, and analy-sis,”
SPE Reservoir Engineering, 11
(1), 13
–22
(1996). https://doi.org/10.2118/28628-PA Google Scholar
Wen, H.,
“[Oil test Operation Technology],”
4 Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing
(2002). Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Yang, R., Lv, M., Cheng, Y., Nan, X., Liu, X., et al.,
“Dynamic analysis of intermittent well pressure and discussion on productivity utilization Petrochemical Industry Application,”
38 7
(2019). Google Scholar
Ma, L., Li, H. and Lv, C.,
“Analysis on wellbore effusion of gas well and research on drainage gas production process,”
Modern Chemical Research, 81-83,
(2019). Google Scholar
Turner, R. G., Hubbard, M. G. and Dukler, A. E.,
“Analysis and prediction of minimum flow rate for the continuous removal liquids from gas wells,”
Journal of Petroleum Technology, 21
(11), 1475
–1482
(1969). https://doi.org/10.2118/2198-PA Google Scholar
Hui, D., Hu, Y., Li, T., Peng, X., Li, Q. and Zhao, Z.,
“Development characteristics of typical bottom water gas reservoirs and enlightenment of suitable development countermeasures,”
Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 30
(2023). Google Scholar
|