Paper
8 April 1996 Comparison of conventional and CO2 quantitative angiography: fiz or fizzle?
Catherine A. Kusnick M.D., Carl M. Black, Elvira V. Lang, Maria Siebes, William Barnhart, Eric A. Hoffman
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Typically, quantitation of 2D angiographic data has been limited to assessment of luminal edges from a single or, at most, two views. Use of densitometric image information, which can give data more closely related to the 3D geometry of the vessel, has been largely ignored because of imaging problems associated with conventional contrast agents. Recently, in phantom studies, we have demonstrated that the use of CO2 as an angiographic contrast agent may eliminate many of the obstacles previously limiting the use of densitometric approaches to quantitating 2D angiograms. This may allow us to provide an evaluation more closely related to the 3D geometry of the vasculature of interest. In this paper, we discuss our approach to CO2 angiography and provide illustrative angiographic studies demonstrating the potential breakthrough CO2 angiography may provide in extracting 3D information from 2D data sets.
© (1996) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Catherine A. Kusnick M.D., Carl M. Black, Elvira V. Lang, Maria Siebes, William Barnhart, and Eric A. Hoffman "Comparison of conventional and CO2 quantitative angiography: fiz or fizzle?", Proc. SPIE 2709, Medical Imaging 1996: Physiology and Function from Multidimensional Images, (8 April 1996); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.237854
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Angiography

Diagnostics

Visualization

Carbon dioxide

Blood

Densitometry

Hemodynamics

Back to Top