Open Access
9 June 2021 Anomalous unidirectional excitation of high-k hyperbolic modes using all-electric metasources
Zhiwei Guo, Yang Long, Haitao Jiang, Jie Ren, Hong Chen
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The unidirectional excitation of near-field optical modes is a fundamental prerequisite for many photonic applications, such as wireless power transfer and information communications. We experimentally construct all-electric Huygens and spin metasources and demonstrate anomalous unidirectional excitation of high-k hyperbolic modes in two types of hyperbolic metasurfaces. We use a Huygens metasource to study the unidirectional excitation of hyperbolic bulk modes in a planar hyperbolic metamaterial (HMM). Specifically, unidirectional excitation is the same as that in free space in the vertical direction, but opposite to that in free space in the horizontal direction. This anomalous unidirectional excitation is determined by the anisotropic HMM dispersion. In addition, we use a spin metasource to observe the anomalous photonic spin Hall effect in a planar hyperbolic waveguide. For a near-field source with a specific spin, the guide mode with a fixed directional wave vector is excited due to spin-momentum locking. Because the directions of momentum and energy flows in the HMM waveguide are opposite, the unidirectional excitation of hyperbolic guided modes is reversed. Our results not only uncover the sophisticated electromagnetic functionalities of metasources in the near-field but may also provide novel opportunities for the development of integrated optical devices.

1.

Introduction

Hyperbolic metamaterials (HMMs), an important class of artificial anisotropic material with hyperbolic isofrequency contours (IFCs), have recently attracted significant attention due to their unique ability to control interactions between light and matter.14 Tuning the hyperbolic dispersion shape allows light propagation in HMMs to be flexibly controlled to produce all-angle negative refraction,58 collimation,9,10 beam splitting,11,12 and robust transmission.13,14 Tuning the topological transition of the dispersion from a closed IFC to an open hyperbolic IFC significantly enhances the optical density of states (DOS). This has important consequences for the strong enhancement of spontaneous emission.15,16 In addition, HMMs can convert evanescent waves into propagating waves with large wave vectors. This property has enabled the demonstration of superresolution imaging that overcomes the diffraction limit17,18 and long-range dipole–dipole interactions beyond the near-field coupling limitation.1921 Interestingly, under near-field excitation, electromagnetic (EM) waves in HMMs propagate along fixed channels at the subwavelength scale. This is similar to crossing waveguides.22 These extraordinary guided modes with strong spatial localization correspond to high-k modes with large DOSs in HMMs. In 2014, Kapitanova et al.23 experimentally demonstrated the photonic spin Hall effect (PSHE) based on spin-orbit coupling of extraordinary guided modes in HMMs. This optical spin-orbit locking phenomenon comes from the transverse spin property of evanescent waves.2431 Unlike with the PSHE in surface plasmon polaritons at a metal–dielectric interface,3234 the directional excitation of spin dipoles in HMMs occurs inside the bulk of the structure. This greatly broadens the near-field coupling control scope.35 Although the spin dipole can achieve unidirectional excitation based on spin-orbit coupling, switchable and flexibly controlled unidirectional excitation in HMMs is a highly concerning topic.36 Diversified unidirectional emission may facilitate new wireless power transfer37 and information communications38 applications.

An alternative way to achieve unidirectional emission is the Huygens source. As a coherent dipole with orthogonal electrical and magnetic dipole resonances, a Huygens source can produce directional radiation in the far field when the Kerker condition is satisfied.39 Although the Huygens source was originally introduced as a fictitious entity, some effective approaches to implementing it using polarizable subwavelength particles that sustain both electric and magnetic dipolar resonances have been proposed.40 Thus far, the Huygens source has attracted extensive attention for production of unidirectional far-field antennas.41,42 Based on this far-field property, efficient Huygens metasurfaces with arbitrary EM wave fronts have recently been proposed for all-dielectric4346 and actively controlled systems.47 Specifically, Picardi et al.48 theoretically revealed the near-field directionality of a Huygens dipole. The switchable excitation directions of the Huygens dipole are different from those of spin dipoles because of obvious differences in symmetry characteristics.49 These remarkable findings show that the near-field properties of a Huygens dipole can provide new physical insights into various unidirectional near-field couplings.4850

In this paper, we use two-dimensional (2D) transmission lines (TLs) with lumped elements to design and fabricate circuit-based HMMs and hyperbolic waveguides. Then, we experimentally construct all-electric Huygens and spin metasources and demonstrate anomalous unidirectional excitation of high-k hyperbolic modes. In particular, we experimentally observe the anomalous unidirectional excitation of hyperbolic bulk modes in the horizontal direction using a Huygens metasource. Moreover, we study the anomalous unidirectional excitation of hyperbolic guided modes using the spin metasource. Our results not only clearly show the interesting near-field unidirectional emissions of the Huygens metasource in HMMs and spin metasources in hyperbolic waveguides, but also provide a flexible platform for the construction of more complex composite metasources. Related designs can be extended to the fields of natural 2D materials51,52 and acoustics systems.31,53,54

2.

Unidirectional Excitation of Hyperbolic Bulk Modes Using a Huygens Metasource

The unidirectional excitation of magnetic metamaterials for transverse-electric-polarized (TE-polarized) waves has recently attracted extensive attention.5558 In this section, we present near-field unidirectional excitation of a Huygens metasource in planar magnetic HMMs,59,60 which may be easy to integrate, exhibit small losses, and facilitate new applications such as energy transfer and switching. The emission properties of EM waves in media depend on their dispersion in wave vector space, which is characterized by their IFCs. Figure 1 shows examples of closed ellipsoid and open hyperboloid IFCs. Upon comparing Fig. 1(a) with Fig. 1(b), it is apparent that the HMM, which has an open IFC, has a diverging shell volume. This implies that the ideal HMM can support an infinite optical DOS.15,16 Because of the special HMM dispersion, the propagation direction of a wave in an HMM is different from that in a normal anisotropic material with a closed IFC. Based on the boundary conditions and the causality law, when a wave with a positive wave vector (kx>0, ky>0, and kz>0) is incident on a normal material, the energy flows in all directions are positive [Fig. 1(a)]. However, when a wave with a positive wave vector (kx>0, ky>0, and kz>0) is incident on an HMM, the energy flow in the z- (x- or y-) direction is positive (negative), as shown in Fig. 1(b). We reveal that hyperbolic bulk modes can be used to achieve anomalous unidirectional excitations during near-field excitations of an all-electric Huygens metasource.

Fig. 1

Various 3D IFCs for (a) a closed ellipsoid and (b) an open hyperboloid when the frequency increases from ω to ω+δω. The energy flows in the x, y, and z directions are marked using red, pink, and yellow arrows, respectively.

AP_3_3_036001_f001.png

We calculate radiation patterns for simple point dipoles in air and HMM (μz=1.47, μx=μy=1, and ε=3.57) using the finite-element method module of COMSOL Multiphysics. These are shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(f), respectively. A comparison of Figs. 2(a) and 2(f) clearly shows that light propagates along all in-plane directions in air but only along a certain range of angles in the HMM. Specifically, the field is much stronger at hyperbolic asymptotes than elsewhere because of the larger optical DOS.23 Then, we numerically study near-field unidirectional excitation by all-electric Huygens metasources in air and HMMs, as shown in Figs. 2(b)2(e) and Figs. 2(g)2(j), respectively. The Huygens metasource is composed of three dipole sources separated by small spacings (dλ). These discrete dipoles have the same intensity but different phases along the horizontal and vertical directions.49 Since the all-electric Huygens metasource is composed of three electric dipoles arranged successively with phases of 0 deg, 90 deg, and 180 deg (0 deg, 90  deg, and 180 deg) along the vertical direction (z direction), the EM waves cause upward (downward) unidirectional excitation in air, as shown in Fig. 2(b) [Fig. 2(c)]. The results are similar for the HMMs in Figs. 2(g) and 2(h). However, anomalous unidirectional excitation occurs in HMMs when the Huygens metasource is constructed along the horizontal direction (x direction). The direction of the leftward (rightward) unidirectional excitation of Huygens metasources at 0 deg, 90 deg, and 180 deg (0 deg, 90  deg, and 180 deg) in air [Figs. 2(d) and 2(e)] changes to rightward (leftward) unidirectional excitation in an HMM [Figs. 2(i) and 2(j)].

Fig. 2

(a) Radiation patterns for a simple point dipole in air, where the EM waves can propagate along all directions. (b)–(e) Unidirectional propagation from the Huygens metasource in air. (f) Radiation patterns for a simple point dipole in HMM, where the EM waves propagate mainly along the four channels with high-k modes. Panels (g)–(j) are similar to (b)–(e) but for unidirectional propagation of the Huygens metasources in an HMM.

AP_3_3_036001_f002.png

To understand anomalous unidirectional phenomena in the HMM, we consider the HMM with μx=μy=μ>0, μz<0, and ε>0. The dispersion in the xoz 2D plane is kx2μz+kz2μ=ε(ωc)2, with the bulk mode as Ey=A, Ex=Ez=0, Hx=Acωkzμ, Hy=0, and Hz=Acωkxμz, where A is a constant, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and kx and kz are the x and z components of the wave vector, respectively. According to the electric field of this bulk mode, the eigenfunction for the frequency ωk can be written as uk=(0,1,0)ei(kxx+kzz), k=(kx,0,kz), and the Green function will be61

Eq. (1)

G(r,r,ω)=kc2uk*(r,ωk)uk(r,ωk)ωk2ω2.

The Huygens metasource can be composed of three phase-delayed electric dipoles separated by a distance d. For example, the horizontally placed Huygens metasource can be expressed as p(r,t)=p0ey[δ(x)±iδ(xd)iδ(x+d)]eiωt=p(r,ω)eiωt. The excited electric field will be E(r,ω)=ω2μ0G(r,r,ω)p(r,ω)dr, and the component after the Fourier transformation becomes

Eq. (2)

Ey(kx,ky,ωk)=μ0c2ω2ωk2ω2p0Fk=μ0c2ω2ωk2ω2p0(1±ieikxdieikxd),
where Fk=1±ieikxdieikxd is the excitation factor raised by the source array. One can determine that the time-averaged Poynting vector for the bulk mode uk is S=12Re[E*×H]=c|A|22ω(kxμz,0,kzμ)T. Using the propagation angle θ=arg[Sx+iSz]=arg[kxμz+ikzμ] of the excited electric field, we can obtain the relation between the excitation factor Fk and the propagation angle θ, as shown in Fig. 3. Comparing the relation between Fk and θ in air (the orange line in Fig. 3), we can see that the Huygens metasource placed along the vertical direction excites the HMM mode with the same directionality as in air [Figs. 3(a) and 3(b)]. However, the horizontally placed metasource produces the opposite directionality [Figs. 3(c) and 3(d)]. The main physical reason behind the anomalous excitation phenomena for the horizontally placed Huygens metasource is due to the special HMM dispersion, as shown in Fig. 1(b). The anomalous excitation phenomena appear because of the directional mismatch between the wave vector k=(kx,0,kz)T and the time-averaged energy flow S=c|A|22ω(kxμz,0,kzμ)T for the HMM (μz<0, μ>0). Obviously, the extraordinary guide mode present in HMMs makes them a good research platform for the study of abundant unidirectional transmission.

Fig. 3

The |Fk| of the Huygens metasources as functions of the propagation direction θ in different settings. The Huygens metasources are shown in the purple boxes with numbers that indicate the phase delay (degree unit) of each excitation source. The |Fk| functions (normalized by their maximum values) in the HMM and air are denoted by blue and orange lines, respectively. The dashed red and black lines indicate the HMM dispersion ω(kx,kz) and the maximum value of |Fk|. Here, d=0.1λ, where λ is the wavelength in vacuum, and p0=1.

AP_3_3_036001_f003.png

Based on 2D TLs with lumped elements in the microwave regime, we construct circuit-based magnetic HMMs and experimentally demonstrate anomalous unidirectional transmissions from Huygens metasources in HMMs. A schematic of the effective HMM is shown in Fig. 4(a). Our structure is constructed on a commercially printed F4B circuit board (relative permittivity εr=2.2) with thickness h=1.6  mm. The width of the microstrip is w=2  mm, and the length of a unit cell is p=12  mm. In our designed structure, the effective HMM is produced by loading lumped series capacitors C=1  pF in the x direction. Lumped resistors R=85  Ω are loaded on the boundary of the sample to provide perfect matching conditions and avoid reflection from the sample boundary. The Huygens metasource experimental scheme is similar to the theoretical design in Fig. 2. Specifically, three voltage sources are used to construct an all-electric Huygens metasource in the center of the structure. The external integrated electric circuits and extra TL systems are exploited to modulate the phase delays of the constituent dipoles.33,49 These are marked by the red dots in Fig. 4(b). For clarity, we magnify the lumped capacitor elements in the inset of Fig. 4(b). The effective circuit models of the HMM are also shown at the bottom of the inset. The structural factor of a TL in a circuit-based HMM is defined as g=Z0/ηeff, where Z0 and ηeff are the characteristic impedance and effective wave impedance of the TL, respectively.62,63 Especially, when w>h, g=1/[1.393+w/h+(2/3)ln(w/h+1.444)]. The structural factor of our designed structure is g0.3. The metal used to design the microstrip is copper, and tin is plated on the surface of the metal to avoid oxidation. Especially, the copper in the microwave regime can be seen as the perfect electric conductor, and the loss of copper can be ignored. In fact, for the TL-based effective HMM, the loss mainly comes from the dielectric loss of the F4B substrate (the loss tangent is tanδ=0.0079), and it has been demonstrated by previous literature that the loss of the dielectric substrate has little effect on the bulk modes of circuit-based HMMs.6,14,20 Because the unit size in the TL system is much smaller than the wavelength, the effective permittivity of a 2D TL in a quasi-static TE-polarized solution can be written as (see more details in the Supplementary Material)62,63

Eq. (3)

ε=2C0·g/ε0,μx=L0g·μ0,μz=L0g·μ01ω2·C·d·g·μ0,
where ε0 and μ0 are the permittivity and permeability of the vacuum, respectively; ω is the angular frequency; and C0 and L0 denote the capacitance and inductance, respectively, of the TL per unit length.62,63 In Eq. (1), ε=3.57 (red dashed line), μx=1 (green dot dashed line), and the dependence of μz on the frequency (solid blue line) are shown in Fig. 4(c). Specifically, μz0 when the frequency is 2.36 GHz (green dotted line). When the frequency is smaller than this critical value, μz is negative. The dispersion relation of a circuit-based metamaterial is described by kx2ε·μz+kz2ε·μx=(ωc)2. We use Eq. (3) to derive the effective parameters of the TLs and produce the results in Fig. 4(d). At the reference frequency of 1.5 GHz, μz=1.47, μx=1, and ε=3.57. Under these parameters, we plot the IFC of this HMM using the solid blue line in Fig. 4(d). The IFC is a general hyperbola, in which the two asymptotes are represented by red dashed lines. Because the DOS is largest along the directions of the two asymptotes, the energy inside the general HMM is mainly confined to two pathways determined by the directions of the asymptotes.23 The dashed blue line indicates that the IFC calculation frequency is slightly higher than that of the solid blue line. The green arrows indicate the direction of the energy flow. In Fig. 4(d), we see that the energy flow direction in an HMM can be controlled flexibly using the hyperbolic dispersion. In particular, the energy flow along the z (x) direction is positive (negative). Therefore, hyperbolic bulk modes in HMMs can be used to achieve unidirectional excitation along various directions.

Fig. 4

(a) Schematic of a TL-based HMM structure with p=12  mm, w=2  mm, and C=1  pF. (b) Prototype of a 2D TL with 21×21 unit cells and the related anisotropic 2D-circuit model. The source is near the center of the sample. The inset shows the amplified lumped capacitors, which are loaded in the x direction. (c) The effective anisotropic EM parameters are based on the TLs, where μz=0 is marked using a green dotted line. (d) The IFC of a circuit-based HMM with μz=1.47, μx=1, and ε=3.57 at f=1.5  GHz. The asymptote is represented by purple dashed lines.

AP_3_3_036001_f004.png

Full-wave simulations of the circuit-based system were performed using commercially available software (CST Microwave Studio) that included a finite-element frequency-domain solver. The HMMs are excited by a simple point source or effective all-electric Huygens metasources close to the center of the structure. For comparison, we consider a circuit-based isotropic medium with a closed IFC (ε=3.57, μx=1).20 The EM waves from a point source can propagate in all in-plane directions when the frequency is 1.5 GHz, as with the simulated distribution of an out-of-plane electric field Ey in Fig. 5(a). Figures 5(b)5(e) show the unidirectional excitation of a Huygens metasource in a normal material. We then simulate the radiation patterns of a point source and four types of Huygens metasources in circuit-based HMMs at a frequency of 1.5 GHz, as shown in Figs. 5(f)5(j). The unidirectional excitation of hyperbolic bulk modes along the z (x) direction is clearly the same (opposite) as that in a normal medium. This selective directional near-field coupling is enabled by the Huygens metasource composed of all-electric source components with a symmetry-associated inner freedom and promotes several symmetry-related near-field excitation behaviors. Especially, the Huygens metasource is strictly associated with the parity-time (P^T^:rr, tt) symmetry and thus will inherit these symmetry properties naturally.49 In contrast, the spin dipoles and Janus dipoles are associated with the parity-reversal (P^:rr) symmetry and time-reversal (T^:tt) symmetry, respectively. The metasources will be able to excite the mode pairs with the corresponding symmetry features. On the other hand, the Huygens metasource can be explained in terms of the time-averaged Poynting vector Re[E*×H], which can produce fields associated with a net power flow in a given direction.48 Therefore, in addition to the near-field directionality, Huygens metasource can also be used to realize the far-field directionality, which is not possessed by spin and Janus dipoles. During the experimental process, signals are generated using a vector network analyzer (Agilent PNA Network Analyzer N5222A). One monopole source near the center of the sample is the point source used to excite the circuit-based prototype. In addition, three vertical monopole sources at the subwavelength scale are used to construct the all-electric Huygens metasource. A small, 2-mm-long homemade rod antenna is employed to measure the out-of-plane electric field Ey at a fixed height of 1 mm from the planar microstrip. The sample is placed on an automatic translation device with a scanning step of 1 mm. This makes accurately probing the field distribution using a near-field scanning measurement feasible. The field amplitudes are normalized according to their respective maximum amplitudes. The experimentally measured results regarding the unidirectional excitation of hyperbolic bulk modes in Figs. 5(k)5(o) match the simulated results in Figs. 5(f)5(j) well. A comparison of the radiation patterns in the normal medium and the HMM shows that anomalous unidirectional excitation of hyperbolic bulk modes in the horizontal direction can be achieved using a Huygens metasource.

Fig. 5

(a) Simulated point dipole radiation patterns in the circuit-based normal medium. The EM waves can propagate along all directions. (b)–(e) Unidirectional propagation of the Huygens metasources in a circuit-based normal medium. Panels (f)–(j) correspond, respectively, to (a)–(e) but for the simulated radiation patterns in the circuit-based HMM. Panels (k)–(o) correspond, respectively, to (a)–(e) but for the measured radiation patterns in the circuit-based HMM.

AP_3_3_036001_f005.png

3.

Unidirectional Excitations of Hyperbolic Guided Modes Using a Spin Metasource

Anomalous unidirectional excitation by an all-electric Huygens metasource in HMMs provides new ways to control EM waves within a near-field regime. Recently, special near-field dipoles, including spin dipoles,64,65 Huygens dipoles,66,67 Janus dipoles,48 and composite spinning dipoles,68,69 have provided a good platform for studying interesting physical mechanisms such as transverse-spin-associated globally unique handedness,70 bulk EM waves,35,71 bound states in continuum,72 and topological edge states.73,74 In this section, we demonstrate experimentally that a spin metasource can be used to produce the anomalous PSHE in a hyperbolic waveguide. Photons with different circular polarizations (optical spins) may propagate in different directions. This is referred to as the PSHE.23,33 Optical PSHE spin-orbit locking has attracted significant research attention and may be useful for many interesting fields of physics, such as chiral quantum optics64 and topological photonics75 within the near-field regime. In addition, the unidirectional excitation of optical modes is a fundamental prerequisite for numerous photonic applications, such as polarization beam splitters and directional radiation antennas. Here, we study abnormal directional excitation in a circuit-based hyperbolic waveguide. Because of their open-dispersion IFCs, HMMs support propagation of high-k modes with large effective refractive indices, thus allowing hyperbolic waveguides to be miniaturized.76,77 A near-field spin source couples with only one guided mode in the specific propagation direction determined by the handedness of the spin source.49

Here, the hyperbolic waveguide is composed of a core layer of HMM and two cladding layers made of a double positive (DPS) medium. As in the above section, the circuit-based HMM is produced using TLs by loading series lumped capacitors in the x direction. Here, C=5  pF, w=2.8  mm, and the other parameters remain unchanged. In this case, the structure factor is g0.26, and the effective EM parameters of the circuit-based HMM can be obtained using Eq. (3): μz=(11.316)×1018/f2, μx=1, and ε=3.63. In addition, a simple TL system without elements can produce a DPS medium (εD=3.63 and μD=1), as shown in Fig. 6(a). The corresponding effective circuit model of the unit structure of the circuit-based DPS medium is shown in Fig. 6(b). To emphasize the role of the HMM waveguide, we systematically compare a normal waveguide to a hyperbolic waveguide. The normal waveguide is composed of a DPS-medium core layer and two cladding layers of negative-μ (MNG) medium [εM=3.63, μM=(11.316)×1018/f2].33 The circuit-based MNG medium can be easily constructed using TLs by loading series lumped capacitors in both the x and z directions, as shown in Fig. 6(c). Analogous to Fig. 6(b), the effective circuit model of the circuit-based MNG medium is shown in Fig. 6(d). Based on the boundary conditions, the dispersion relation for the lowest-order guide modes for TE polarization in HMM78,79 and normal33 waveguides can be obtained (see more details in the Supplementary Material). Figures 6(e) and 6(f) show the dispersion relations of the circuit-based hyperbolic waveguide and normal waveguide, respectively, for a core width of dc. The group velocity is calculated using vg=ω/kx, which provides negative and positive group velocities for the hyperbolic and normal guided modes, respectively.

Fig. 6

(a), (b) Structure and related anisotropic 2D-circuit model of the TL-based DPS medium. Panels (c) and (d) are similar to (a) and (b) but for MNG media. Here, p=12  mm, w=2.8  mm, and C=5  pF. (e) Dispersion relations of guided modes in a hyperbolic waveguide that is composed of a core HMM layer and two DPS-medium cladding layers. The structure is shown in the inset. Panel (f) is similar to (e), but for a normal waveguide, which is composed of a core layer of DPS medium and two MNG-medium cladding layers.

AP_3_3_036001_f006.png

Figure 7(a) shows a schematic illustration of abnormal PSHE in a hyperbolic waveguide. The simulated electric-field distributions in Figs. 7(c) and 7(e) show that, for a counterclockwise (clockwise) near-field spin metasource, the hyperbolic guided mode along the interface runs from left (right) to right (left). For comparison, we also study directional excitation in a circuit-based normal waveguide [Fig. 7(b)]. The rightward (or leftward) unidirectional excitation of a counterclockwise (or clockwise) spin metasource in the hyperbolic waveguide changes to leftward (or rightward) unidirectional excitation in the normal waveguide, as shown in Figs. 7(d) and 7(f). Therefore, the direction of excitation in the hyperbolic waveguide is opposite that of normal PSHE. The guided mode with the directional wave vector in the PSHE comes from the spin-momentum locking mechanism. The propagation direction is determined by wave vector and energy flow parallelism or anti-parallelism. In a normal waveguide, the direction of directional transmission is the same as that of the wave vector because the wave vector and energy flow are in the same direction. However, in a hyperbolic waveguide, the direction of transmission is reversed because the momentum and energy flow are in opposite directions. The extraordinary guided mode of HMMs makes them a good research platform for the study of abundant unidirectional transmission.

Fig. 7

Schematics of (a) anomalous PSHE in an HMM waveguide and (b) normal PSHE in a DPS waveguide. A source with specific handedness excites only a single-guided mode with a specific propagation direction. Anomalous unidirectional excitation occurs in the HMM waveguide. For a counterclockwise-spin metasource, only the guided modes that propagate from right to left and left to right are excited in the (c) HMM and (d) DPS waveguides, respectively. However, for a clockwise-spin metasource, only the guided modes that propagate from left to right and right to left are excited in the (e) HMM and (f) DPS waveguides, respectively.

AP_3_3_036001_f007.png

To conclude this section, experimental work that demonstrates anomalous unidirectional excitation of a circuit-based magnetic hyperbolic waveguide is discussed. Examples of circuit-based hyperbolic and normal waveguides are shown in Figs. 8(a) and 8(b), respectively. The core layers are marked by yellow dotted rectangles, and the all-electric spin metasources are marked using four dots. For a normal guided mode excited by a counterclockwise-spin metasource, the waves run along the interface from right to left, as shown in Fig. 8(d). However, unidirectional transmission is reversed for the hyperbolic guided mode in Fig. 8(c). Similarly, for a normal guided mode excited by a clockwise spin metasource, the waves run along the interface from left to right in Fig. 8(f), whereas in a hyperbolic guided mode excited by a clockwise-spin metasource, the waves run along the interface from right to left in Fig. 8(e). Overall, the experimental field patterns in Fig. 8 are in good agreement with the simulated results in Fig. 7. Therefore, anomalous unidirectional excitation of hyperbolic guided modes is observed experimentally using an all-electric spin metasource.

Fig. 8

(a) Experimental schematic of a circuit-based hyperbolic waveguide. Measured near-field distributions of |Ey| for (c) counterclockwise and (e) clockwise spin metasources. Panels (b), (d), and (f) are similar to (a), (c), and (e), but for the circuit-based normal waveguide.

AP_3_3_036001_f008.png

4.

Conclusion

Anomalous unidirectional excitation effects of hyperbolic modes were observed using near-field all-electric metasources. For the hyperbolic bulk mode, anomalous unidirectional excitation in the horizontal direction was achieved using a Huygens metasource. Moreover, using a hyperbolic waveguide, in which the group velocity and wave vector directions are opposite, anomalous unidirectional excitation of hyperbolic guided modes was demonstrated using a spin metasource. Based on the results from a hyperbolic bulk mode excited by a Huygens metasource and a hyperbolic guided mode excited by a spin metasource, we found that the circuit-based HMM is a good platform for the study of anomalous unidirectional excitation and has potential applications in near-field optical routing and energy transfer.

Acknowledgments

Z. W. Guo and Y. Long contributed equally to this work. This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0301101); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant Nos. 12004284, 11775159, 61621001, and 11935010); the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (Grant Nos. 18ZR1442800 and 18JC1410900); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 2019TQ0232 and 2019M661605); the Shanghai Super Postdoctoral Incentive Program; and the Opening Project of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Special Artificial Microstructure Materials and Technology. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. 

A. Poddubny et al., “Hyperbolic metamaterials,” Nat. Photonics, 7 (12), 948 –957 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.243 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

2. 

P. Shekhar, J. Atkinson and Z. Jacob, “Hyperbolic metamaterials: fundamentals and applications,” Nano Converg., 1 (1), 14 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-014-0014-6 Google Scholar

3. 

L. Ferrari et al., “Hyperbolic metamaterials and their applications,” Prog. Quantum Electron., 40 1 –40 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantelec.2014.10.001 PQUEAH 0079-6727 Google Scholar

4. 

Z. W. Guo, H. T. Jiang and H. Chen, “Hyperbolic metamaterials: from dispersion manipulation to applications,” J. Appl. Phys., 127 (7), 071101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5128679 JAPIAU 0021-8979 Google Scholar

5. 

A. A. High et al., “Visible-frequency hyperbolic metasurface,” Nature, 522 (7555), 192 –196 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14477 Google Scholar

6. 

Z. W. Guo et al., “Focusing and super-resolution with partial cloaking based on linear-crossing metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. Appl., 10 (6), 064048 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.064048 PRAHB2 2331-7019 Google Scholar

7. 

X. Lin et al., “All-angle negative refraction of highly squeezed plasmon and phonon polaritons in graphene-boron nitride heterostructures,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 114 (26), 6717 –6721 (2017). Google Scholar

8. 

J. Jiang, X. Lin and B. L. Zhang, “Broadband negative refraction of highly squeezed hyperbolicpolaritons in 2D materials,” Research, 2018 2532819 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2532819 Google Scholar

9. 

K. Yu et al., “Loss-induced topological transition of dispersion in metamaterials,” J. Appl. Phys., 119 (20), 203102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4952378 JAPIAU 0021-8979 Google Scholar

10. 

Z. W. Guo et al., “Actively controlling the topological transition of dispersion based on electrically controllable metamaterials,” Appl. Sci., 8 (4), 596 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/app8040596 Google Scholar

11. 

P. X. Zheng et al., “Anomalous wave propagation in topological transition metasurfaces,” Adv. Opt. Mater., 7 (11), 1801483 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201801483 2195-1071 Google Scholar

12. 

Z. W. Guo, H. T. Jiang and H. Chen, “Linear-crossing metamaterials mimicked by multilayers with two kinds of single negative materials,” J. Phys.: Photonics, 2 (1), 011001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7647/ab5ecb Google Scholar

13. 

L. Shen et al., “Broadband enhancement of on-chip single-photon extraction via tilted hyperbolic metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. Rev., 7 (2), 021403 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5141275 Google Scholar

14. 

Z. W. Guo, H. T. Jiang and H. Chen, “Abnormal wave propagation in tilted linear-crossing metamaterials,” Adv. Photonics Res., 2 (1), 021403 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adpr.202000071 Google Scholar

15. 

H. N. Krishnamoorthy et al., “Topological transitions in metamaterials,” Science, 336 (6078), 205 –209 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219171 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

16. 

Z. Jacob, I. I. Smolyaninov and E. E. Narimanov, “Broadband purcell effect: radiative decay engineering with metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 100 (18), 181105 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4710548 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

17. 

Z. W. Liu et al., “Far-field optical hyperlens magnifying sub-diffraction-limited objects,” Science, 315 (5819), 1686 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137368 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

18. 

I. I. Smolyaninov, Y.-J. Hung and C. C. Davis, “Magnifying superlens in the visible frequency range,” Science, 315 (5819), 1699 –1701 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1138746 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

19. 

S.-A. Biehs, V. M. Menon and G. S. Agarwal, “Long-range dipole–dipole interaction and anomalous Förster energy transfer across a hyperbolic metamaterial,” Phys. Rev. B, 93 (24), 245439 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.245439 Google Scholar

20. 

Z. W. Guo et al., “Enhancement of electromagnetically induced transparency in metamaterials using long range coupling mediated by a hyperbolic material,” Opt. Express, 26 (2), 627 –641 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.000627 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

21. 

W. D. Newman et al., “Observation of long-range dipole-dipole interactions in hyperbolic metamaterials,” Sci. Adv., 4 (10), eaar5278 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar5278 STAMCV 1468-6996 Google Scholar

22. 

M. Neugebauer, P. Banzer and S. Nechayev, “Emission of circularly polarized light by a linear dipole,” Sci. Adv., 5 (6), eaav7588 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav7588 STAMCV 1468-6996 Google Scholar

23. 

P. V. Kapitanova et al., “Photonic spin Hall effect in hyperbolic metamaterials for polarization-controlled routing of subwavelength modes,” Nat. Commun., 5 (1), 3226 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4226 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

24. 

K. Y. Bliokh et al., “Spin–orbit interactions of light,” Nat. Photonics, 9 (12), 796 –808 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.201 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

25. 

K. Y. Bliokh, D. Smirnova and F. Nori, “Quantum spin Hall effect of light,” Science, 348 (6242), 1448 –1451 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa9519 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

26. 

V. Mechelen and Z. Jacob, “Universal spin-momentum locking of evanescent waves,” Optica, 3 (2), 118 –126 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.000118 Google Scholar

27. 

Y. Long, J. Ren and H. Chen, “Intrinsic spin of elastic waves,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 115 (40), 9951 –9955 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1808534115 Google Scholar

28. 

P. Shi et al., “Transverse spin dynamics in structured electromagnetic guided waves,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 118 (6), e2018816118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2018816118 Google Scholar

29. 

Z. B. Zhang et al., “Controllable transport of nanoparticles along waveguides by spin–orbit coupling of light,” Opt. Express, 29 (4), 6282 –6292 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.418900 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

30. 

F. Feng et al., “On-chip plasmonic spin-Hall nanograting for simultaneously detecting phase and polarization singularities,” Light-Sci. Appl., 9 (1), 95 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-0330-z Google Scholar

31. 

J. S. Eismann et al., “Transverse spinning of unpolarized light,” Nat. Photonics, 15 (2), 156 –161 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-00733-3 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

32. 

J. Rodríguez-Fortuño et al., “Near-field interference for the unidirectional excitation of electromagnetic guided modes,” Science, 340 (6130), 328 –330 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1233739 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

33. 

Z. W. Guo et al., “Photonic spin Hall effect in waveguides composed of two types of single-negative metamaterials,” Sci. Rep., 7 (1), 7742 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08171-y SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

34. 

F. Picardi et al., “Unidirectional evanescent-wave coupling from circularly polarized electric and magnetic dipoles: an angular spectrum approach,” Phys. Rev. B, 95 (24), 245416 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.245416 Google Scholar

35. 

L. Peng et al., “Transverse photon spin of bulk electromagnetic waves in bianisotropic media,” Nat. Photonics, 13 (12), 878 –882 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0521-4 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

36. 

A. Nemilentsau et al., “Switchable and unidirectional plasmonic beacons in hyperbolic two-dimensional materials,” Phys. Rev. B, 99 (20), 201405(R) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.201405 Google Scholar

37. 

F. Q. Yang et al., “Actively controlled asymmetric edge states for directional wireless power transfer,” Opt. Express, 29 (5), 7844 –7857 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.417887 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

38. 

D. Marpaung, J. Yao and J. Capmany, “Integrated microwave photonics,” Nat. Photonics, 13 (2), 80 –90 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0310-5 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

39. 

M. Kerker, D.-S. Wang and C. L. Giles, “Electromagnetic scattering by magnetic spheres,” J. Opt. Soc. Am., 73 (6), 765 –767 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.73.000765 JOSAAH 0030-3941 Google Scholar

40. 

C. Pfeiffer and A. Grbic, “Metamaterial Huygens’ surfaces: tailoring wave fronts with reflectionless sheets,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 110 (19), 197401 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.197401 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

41. 

A. Epstein, J. P. S. Wong and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Cavity-excited Huygens’ metasurface antennas for near-unity aperture illumination efficiency from arbitrarily large apertures,” Nat. Commun., 7 (1), 10360 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10360 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

42. 

X. M. Zhang et al., “Dual-band unidirectional emission in a multilayered metal−dielectric nanoantenna,” ACS Omega, 2 (3), 774 –783 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b00121 Google Scholar

43. 

M. Decker et al., “High-efficiency dielectric Huygens’ surfaces,” Adv. Opt. Mater., 3 (6), 813 –820 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201400584 2195-1071 Google Scholar

44. 

S. Liu et al., “Huygens’ metasurfaces enabled by magnetic dipole resonance tuning in split dielectric nanoresonators,” Nano Lett., 17 (7), 4297 –4303 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01301 NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

45. 

S. Nechayev et al., “Huygens’ dipole for polarization-controlled nanoscale light routing,” Phys. Rev. A, 99 (4), 041801(R) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.041801 Google Scholar

46. 

M. I. Abdelrahman et al., “Experimental demonstration of spectrally broadband Huygens sources using low-index spheres,” APL Photonics, 4 (2), 020802 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5080980 Google Scholar

47. 

K. Chen et al., “A reconfgurable active huygens’ metalens,” Adv. Mater., 29 (17), 1606422 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201606422 ADVMEW 0935-9648 Google Scholar

48. 

F. Picardi, A. V. Zayats and F. J. Rodríguez-Fortuño, “Janus and Huygens dipoles: near-field directionality beyond spin-momentum locking,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 120 (11), 117402 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.117402 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

49. 

Y. Long et al., “Designing all-electric subwavelength metasources for near-field photonic routings,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 125 (15), 157401 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.157401 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

50. 

S. J. Zeng et al., “Unidirectional excitation of plasmonic waves via a multilayered metal-dielectric-metal Huygens’ nanoantenna,” Opt. Lett., 43 (13), 3053 –3056 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.43.003053 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

51. 

X. Lin et al., “Chiral plasmons with twisted atomic bilayers,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 125 (7), 077401 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.077401 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

52. 

Y. H. Zhong et al., “Toggling near-field directionality via polarization control of surface waves,” Laser Photonics Rev., 15 (4), 2000388 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202000388 Google Scholar

53. 

C. Shi et al., “Observation of acoustic spin,” Natl. Sci. Rev., 6 (4), 707 –712 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwz059 Google Scholar

54. 

Y. Long et al., “Symmetry selective directionality in near-field acoustics,” Nat. Sci. Rev., 7 (6), 1024 –1035 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa040 NPSREL Google Scholar

55. 

M. Wang et al., “Magnetic spin–orbit interaction of light,” Light-Sci. Appl., 7 (1), 14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-018-0009-x Google Scholar

56. 

M. Neugebauer et al., “Magnetic and electric transverse spin density of spatially confined light,” Phys. Rev. X, 8 (2), 021042 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021042 PRXHAE 2160-3308 Google Scholar

57. 

S. S. Kruk et al., “Magnetic hyperbolic optical metamaterials,” Nat. Commun., 7 (1), 11329 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11329 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

58. 

Y. H. Yang et al., “Magnetic hyperbolic metasurface: concept, design, and applications,” Adv. Sci., 5 (12), 1801495 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201801495 Google Scholar

59. 

J. S. Gomez-Diaz and A. Alù, “Flatland optics with hyperbolic metasurfaces,” ACS Photonics, 3 (12), 2211 –2224 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00645 Google Scholar

60. 

Y. Mazor and A. Alù, “Nonreciprocal hyperbolic propagation over moving metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. B, 99 (4), 045407 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.045407 Google Scholar

61. 

L. Novotny and B. Hecht, Principles of Nano-Optics, Cambridge University Press(2012). Google Scholar

62. 

Y. Q. Wang et al., “Circuit-based magnetic hyperbolic cavities,” Phys. Rev. Appl., 13 (4), 044024 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.044024 PRAHB2 2331-7019 Google Scholar

63. 

Y. Q. Chen et al., “Experimental demonstration of the magnetic field concentration effect in circuit-based magnetic near-zero index media,” Opt. Express., 28 (11), 17064 –17075 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.393821 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

64. 

P. Lodahl et al., “Chiral quantum optics,” Nature, 541 (7638), 473 –480 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21037 Google Scholar

65. 

S. Nechayev and P. Banzer, “Mimicking chiral light-matter interaction,” Phys. Rev. B, 99 (24), 241101(R) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.241101 Google Scholar

66. 

M. Liu et al., “Huygens’ metadevices for parametric waves,” Phys. Rev. X, 8 (3), 031077 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031077 PRXHAE 2160-3308 Google Scholar

67. 

A. Bag et al., “Transverse Kerker scattering for angstrom localization of nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 121 (19), 193902 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.193902 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

68. 

M. F. Picardi et al., “Experimental demonstration of linear and spinning Janus dipoles for polarisation- and wavelength-selective near-field coupling,” Light-Sci. Appl., 8 (1), 52 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-019-0162-x Google Scholar

69. 

J. E. Vázquez-Lozano, A. Martínez and F. J. Rodríguez-Fortuño, “Near-field directionality beyond the dipole approximation: electric quadrupole and higher-order multipole angular spectra,” Phys. Rev. Appl., 12 (2), 024065 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.024065 PRAHB2 2331-7019 Google Scholar

70. 

X. Piao, S. Yu and N. Park, “Design of transverse spinning of light with globally unique handedness,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 120 (20), 203901 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.203901 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

71. 

M. Kim et al., “Observation of enhanced optical spin Hall effect in a vertical hyperbolic metamaterial,” ACS Photonics, 6 (10), 2530 –2536 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00904 Google Scholar

72. 

G. Zito et al., “Observation of spin-polarized directive coupling of light at bound states in the continuum,” Optica, 6 (10), 1305 –1312 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.6.001305 Google Scholar

73. 

Y. Li et al., “Topological LC-circuits based on microstrips and observation of electromagnetic modes with orbital angular momentum,” Nat. Commun., 9 (1), 4598 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07084-2 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

74. 

T. Stauber et al., “Unidirectional plasmonic edge modes on general two-dimensional materials,” 2D Mater., 6 (4), 045023 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ab2f05 Google Scholar

75. 

T. Ozawa et al., “Topological photonics,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 91 (1), 015006 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.015006 RMPHAT 0034-6861 Google Scholar

76. 

W. J. Ji et al., “Theory and experimental observation of hyperbolic media based on structural dispersions,” Phys. Rev. Mater., 4 (10), 105202 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.105202 PRBMDO 0163-1829 Google Scholar

77. 

J. C. Fu et al., “Microwave waveguide-type hyperbolic metamaterials,” Adv. Photonics Res., 2 (2), 2000043 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adpr.202000043 Google Scholar

78. 

Y. R. He, S. L. He and X. D. Yang, “Optical field enhancement in nanoscale slot waveguides of hyperbolic metamaterials,” Opt. Lett., 37 (14), 2907 –2909 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.002907 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

79. 

V. E. Babicheva et al., “Finite-width plasmonic waveguides with hyperbolic multilayer cladding,” Opt. Express, 23 (8), 9681 –9689 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.009681 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

Biography

Zhiwei Guo received his PhD in physics from Tongji University in 2019. Currently, he is a postdoctoral fellow in the School of Physics Science and Engineering at Tongji University. His current research interests include metamaterials, topological photonics, and non-Hermitian physics.

Yang Long received his PhD in physics from Tongji University in 2020. His current research interests include spin angular momentum in classical waves, topological physics and the applications of machine learning on physics.

Haitao Jiang received his PhD in physics from Tongji University in 2005. Currently, he is a professor in the School of Physics Science and Engineering at Tongji University. His current research interests include photonic crystals, topological photonics, and metamaterials.

Jie Ren received his PhD in condensed matter physics from National University of Singapore. Currently, he is a professor in the School of Physics Science and Engineering at Tongji University. His current research interests include quantum phononics, wave spin, topological metamaterials, and artificial intelligence.

Hong Chen received his PhD in condensed matter physics from Shanghai Jiaotong University in 1986. Currently, he is a distinguished professor in the School of Physics Science and Engineering at Tongji University. His recently research interests include photonic crystals, metamaterials, plasmonics, and artificial microstructures for manipulation of classical and quantum waves.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Zhiwei Guo, Yang Long, Haitao Jiang, Jie Ren, and Hong Chen "Anomalous unidirectional excitation of high-k hyperbolic modes using all-electric metasources," Advanced Photonics 3(3), 036001 (9 June 2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.3.3.036001
Received: 10 March 2021; Accepted: 20 May 2021; Published: 9 June 2021
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 59 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Waveguides

Near field

Wave propagation

Dispersion

Double positive medium

Near field optics

Circuit switching

Back to Top