Open Access
7 January 2025 Pulse Oximetry: 50 Years of Inventions & Discoveries in Biomedical Optics
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The editorial introduces the JBO Special Issue on Pulse Oximetry.

In 1974, a Japanese bioengineer named Takuo Aoyagi, working for the Nihon Kohden Corp, developed a working prototype of an optical measurement system that sensed blood pulsation by detection of the temporal variation of light transmission through tissue.1,2 These changes showed that macroscopic measurements of diffuse light could directly sample variation in light absorption caused by dilation and constriction of arterial vessels at the heart rate frequency. Arguably, this electrical engineering advance would become perhaps the most impactful development in deep tissue biomedical optics. The discovery found wider recognition through the work of John Severinghaus,3 in the late-1980s, when functional pulse oximeters became commercially realized. All of this progress can be traced to a core discovery that diffuse light transmission through tissue carried temporal signatures with useful information from the microscopic blood vessel network.

The idea that spectroscopic measurement of these temporal signatures could be translated to quantitatively measure arterial blood oxygen saturation was revolutionary. Today, pulse oximeters are ubiquitous in medicine, and the principles discovered in early pulse oximetry have ballooned to inspire many subsequent discoveries. The applications of imaging and sensing with diffuse light are extensive, as are the applications of related temporal and spectroscopic instrumentation and algorithms. In 2024, we celebrated the 50th anniversary of this discovery by a dedicated electrical engineer. The discovery eventually changed mainstream medical care, saving countless lives and transforming our ideas about what is possible with optical measurement through tissue.

This JBO special issue features several contemporary topics in the field of tissue and pulse oximetry with an emphasis on the effects of skin melanin content on oxygenation estimation accuracy, explored through simulation and clinical studies. Additional topics include emerging developments of more realistic solid phantoms for evaluating tissue oximetry technologies, the use of artificial intelligence to improve tissue oxygenation estimation, and the presentation of technological methods to improve dynamic optical imaging approaches for brain oxygenation and tissue perfusion monitoring.

A comprehensive review on the history, status, and outlook of pulse oximetry was contributed by Quaresima, Ferrari, and Scholkmann,4 with an emphasis on the origins of tissue oximetry measurement. Providing further context to the underpinnings of pulse oximetry, Blaney, Sassaroli, and Fantini5 offered a technical perspective on the relationship between arterial oxygen saturation of hemoglobin, and the ratio-of-ratios approach used in standard pulse oximetry to estimate the arterial oxygen saturation of hemoglobin.

With the recent COVID-19 pandemic magnifying the impact of the reduced accuracy of current pulse oximetry designs for quantifying arterial oxygenation in individuals with darker skin, several articles focused on elucidating the mechanisms of the effect of melanin on optical oximetry and proposed solutions to correct for the bias. Research papers from Al-Halawani, Qassem, and Kyriacou;6 Narayanaswamy et al.,7 and Blaney et al.8 all presented Monte Carlo simulation results to uncover the causes of inaccurate blood oxygenation estimation with pulse oximetry in people with dark skin; a research paper from Roy et al.9 explored the effect of melanin on frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy measurements; and research papers from Bhusal et al.10 and Ma et al.11 proposed new methods of solid optical phantom construction that could be used for more realistic testing of pulse oximeter performance with respect to variation in skin pigmentation.

Considering the benefits of machine learning and artificial intelligence for nearly all aspects of our lives, three articles investigated ways in which artificial intelligence can help to improve methods of tissue oxygenation estimation. Gröhl et al.12 introduced a recurrent neural network architecture for spectral unmixing to improve the accuracy of blood oxygenation estimation using multi-spectral photoacoustic data, while Larsson et al.13 and Liao et al.14 developed frameworks to train artificial neural networks that estimate blood oxygen saturation from non-contact multispectral optical data.

Finally, Kamar et al.15 assessed the “Kernel Flow,” a high-density, time-domain cerebral oxygenation measurement system with advantages in distinguishing signals from the brain and scalp,16 while Tang et al.17 compared measurement of the arterial input function of indocyanine green using pulse dye densitometry—a method closely linked to pulse oximetry—against no arterial input function or population-based arterial input function assumption for quantifying tissue perfusion in dynamic fluorescence imaging studies.

Despite the long history and nearly ubiquitous use of pulse oximetry throughout healthcare worldwide, there are reinvigorated efforts to improve the technology—particularly with respect to the effect that darker skin has on the accuracy of devices—and adopt its founding principles to a greater number of protocols and applications. While this JBO special issue commemorates one of the greatest achievements in biomedical optics thus far, on the 50th anniversary of the development of the first pulse oximeter, we intend that the issue also highlights the ongoing efforts and further need for continued development of the technology.

References

1. 

, “Takuo Aoyagi and the pulse oximeter,” https://www.nihonkohden.com/topics/aoyagi.html (). Google Scholar

2. 

T. Aoyagi and K. Miyasaka, “Pulse oximetry: its invention, contribution to medicine and future tasks,” Anesth. Analg., 94 (1 Suppl), S1 –S3 (2002). Google Scholar

3. 

J. W. Severinghaus, “Takuo Aoyagi: discovery of pulse oximetry,” Anesth. Analg., 105 (6), S1 –S4 https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000269514.31660.09 (2007). Google Scholar

4. 

V. Quaresima, M. Ferrari and F. Scholkmann, “Ninety years of pulse oximetry: history, current status, and outlook,” J. Biomed. Opt., 29 (S3), S33307 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33307 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2024). Google Scholar

5. 

G. Blaney, A. Sassaroli and S. Fantini, “Critical analysis of the relationship between arterial saturation and the ratio-of-ratios used in pulse oximetry,” J. Biomed. Opt., 29 (S3), S33313 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33313 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2024). Google Scholar

6. 

R. Al-Halawani, M. Qassem and P. Kyriacou, “Monte Carlo simulation of the effect of melanin concentration on light–tissue interactions for transmittance pulse oximetry measurement,” J. Biomed. Opt., 29 (S3), S33305 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33305 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2024). Google Scholar

7. 

S. K. Narayanaswamy et al., “Exploring the bias: how skin color influences oxygen saturation readings via Monte Carlo simulations,” J. Biomed. Opt., 29 (S3), S33308 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33308 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2024). Google Scholar

8. 

G. Blaney et al., “Dual-ratio approach to pulse oximetry and the effect of skin tone,” J. Biomed. Opt., 29 (S3), S33311 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33311 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2024). Google Scholar

9. 

S. Roy et al., “Exploring the impact and influence of melanin on frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy measurements,” J. Biomed. Opt., 29 (S3), S33310 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33310 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2024). Google Scholar

10. 

A. Bhusal et al., “Development and characterization of silicone-based tissue phantoms for pulse oximeter performance testing,” J. Biomed. Opt., 29 (S3), S33314 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33314 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2024). Google Scholar

11. 

H. Ma et al., “Light-guided dynamic phantom to mimic microvasculature for biomedical applications: an exploration for pulse oximeter,” J. Biomed. Opt., 29 (S3), S33312 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33312 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2024). Google Scholar

12. 

J. Gröhl et al., “Distribution-informed and wavelength-flexible data-driven photoacoustic oximetry,” J. Biomed. Opt., 29 (S3), S33303 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33303 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2024). Google Scholar

13. 

M. Larsson et al., “Artificial neural networks trained on simulated multispectral data for real-time imaging of skin microcirculatory blood oxygen saturation,” J. Biomed. Opt., 29 (S3), S33304 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33304 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2024). Google Scholar

14. 

W. Liao et al., “Leveraging 3D convolutional neural network and 3D visible-near-infrared multimodal imaging for enhanced contactless oximetry,” J. Biomed. Opt., 29 (S3), S33309 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33309 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2024). Google Scholar

15. 

F. Kamar et al., “Assessing changes in regional cerebral hemodynamics in adults with a high-density full-head coverage time-resolved near-infrared spectroscopy device,” J. Biomed. Opt., 29 (S3), S33302 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33302 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2024). Google Scholar

16. 

H. Y. Ban et al., “Kernel Flow: a high channel count scalable time-domain functional near-infrared spectroscopy system,” J. Biomed. Opt., 29 (7), 074710 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.27.7.074710 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2022). Google Scholar

17. 

Y. Tang et al., “Patient-specific arterial input function for accurate perfusion assessment in intraoperative fluorescence imaging,” J. Biomed. Opt., 29 (S3), S33306 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33306 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2024). Google Scholar

Biographies of the authors are not available.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Jana M. Kainerstorfer, Kenneth M. Tichauer, Arjun G. Yodh, Ton van Leeuwen, and Brian W. Pogue "Pulse Oximetry: 50 Years of Inventions & Discoveries in Biomedical Optics," Journal of Biomedical Optics 29(S3), S33301 (7 January 2025). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33301
Published: 7 January 2025
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Oximetry

Oxygenation

Tissues

Biomedical optics

Skin

Oximeters

Biomedical engineering

RELATED CONTENT


Back to Top