Optometric measurements predict performance but not comfort on a virtual object placement task with a stereoscopic three-dimensional display

John P. McIntire; Steve T. Wright; Lawrence K. Harrington; Paul R. Havig II; Scott N. Watamaniuk; Eric L. Heft

doi:10.1117/1.OE.53.6.061711

10 March 2014 Optometric measurements predict performance but not comfort on a virtual object placement task with a stereoscopic three-dimensional display

John P. McIntire, Steve T. Wright, Lawrence K. Harrington, Paul R. Havig II, Scott N. Watamaniuk, Eric L. Heft

Author Affiliations +

Optical Engineering, Vol. 53, Issue 6, 061711 (March 2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.53.6.061711

Abstract

Twelve participants were tested on a simple virtual object precision placement task while viewing a stereoscopic three-dimensional (S3-D) display. Inclusion criteria included uncorrected or best corrected vision of 20/20 or better in each eye and stereopsis of at least 40 arc sec using the Titmus stereotest. Additionally, binocular function was assessed, including measurements of distant and near phoria (horizontal and vertical) and distant and near horizontal fusion ranges using standard optometric clinical techniques. Before each of six 30 min experimental sessions, measurements of phoria and fusion ranges were repeated using a Keystone View Telebinocular and an S3-D display, respectively. All participants completed experimental sessions in which the task required the precision placement of a virtual object in depth at the same location as a target object. Subjective discomfort was assessed using the simulator sickness questionnaire. Individual placement accuracy in S3-D trials was significantly correlated with several of the binocular screening outcomes: viewers with larger convergent fusion ranges (measured at near distance), larger total fusion ranges (convergent plus divergent ranges, measured at near distance), and/or lower (better) stereoscopic acuity thresholds were more accurate on the placement task. No screening measures were predictive of subjective discomfort, perhaps due to the low levels of discomfort induced.

Citation Download Citation

John P. McIntire, Steve T. Wright, Lawrence K. Harrington, Paul R. Havig II, Scott N. Watamaniuk, and Eric L. Heft "Optometric measurements predict performance but not comfort on a virtual object placement task with a stereoscopic three-dimensional display," Optical Engineering 53(6), 061711 (10 March 2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.53.6.061711

Published: 10 March 2014

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE