A number of researchers have attempted to model human driving or flying skills (e.g., acceleration, steering, vehicle following, etc) in an effort to develop robotic or simulated driver models. In these applications, validation consists of comparing the source data to the model output; thus, it is assumed that model fidelity is correlated with similarity to true human performance. This paper reviews some of the validation metrics found in the literature and discusses the limitations of these metrics. It also presents an alternative metric designed to mitigate these limitations and the test-bed designed to derive this metric. Finally, it illustrates the application of this metric to a number of different trajectory models built through a variety of modeling techniques (e.g., Kalman filters, neural networks, and Newtonian equations).
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.