Mr. Brian Dunne Profile

Brian Dunne

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (2)

SPIE Journal Paper | 22 October 2024

Starshade exoplanet data challenge: what we learned

Mario Damiano, Stuart Shaklan, Renyu Hu, Brian Dunne, Angelle Tanner, Aly Nida, Joseph Carson, Sergi Hildebrandt, Doug Lisman

JATIS, Vol. 10, Issue 04, 048001, (October 2024) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.10.1117/1.JATIS.10.4.048001

KEYWORDS: Planets, Exoplanets, Engineering, Error analysis, Equipment, Point spread functions, Independent component analysis, Stars, Image analysis, Coronagraphy

Read Abstract +

Starshade is one of the technologies that will enable the observation and characterization of small planets around nearby stars through direct imaging. Extensive models have been developed to describe a starshade’s optical performance and noise budget in exoplanet imaging. The Starshade Exoplanet Data Challenge was designed to validate this noise budget and evaluate the capabilities of image-processing techniques by inviting community participating teams to analyze >1000 simulated images of hypothetical exoplanetary systems observed through a starshade. Because the starshade would suppress the starlight so well, the dominant noise source remaining in the images becomes the exozodiacal disks and their structures. We summarize the techniques used by the participating teams and compare their findings with the truth. With an independent component analysis to remove the background, ∼70% of the inner planets (close to the inner working angle) have been detected along with ∼30% of the outer planets. Planet detection becomes more difficult in the cases of higher disk inclination as the false negative and false positive counts increase. Interestingly, we found little difference in the planet detection rate between 10−10 and 10−9 instrument contrast, confirming that the dominant limitations are from the astrophysical background and not the performance of the starshade. A non-parametric background calibration scheme, such as the independent component analysis reported here, results in a mean residual of 10% the background brightness. This background estimation error leads to substantial false positives and negatives and systematic bias in the planet flux estimation and should be included in the estimation of the planet detection signal-to-noise ratio for imaging using a starshade and also a coronagraph that delivers exozodi-limited imaging. These results corroborate the starshade noise budget and provide new insight into background calibration that will be useful for anticipating the science capabilities of future high-contrast imaging space missions.

Proceedings Article | 24 August 2024 Poster

Starshade Exoplanet Data Challenge: what we learned

Renyu Hu, Mario Damiano, Stuart Shaklan, Brian Dunne, Angelle Tanner, Joseph Carson, Sergi Hildebrandt, Doug Lisman

Proceedings Volume 13092, 130925B (2024) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3018149

Read Abstract +

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years