Estimates of forest biomass are needed to account for carbon at the tree, stand and regional scales. Sample plots of national forest inventories provide the basic database for these estimates. At the tree scale, a common estimation method is the use of an allometric equation that relates a tree's predicted compartment biomass yi (i = foliage, branches, stem wood or stem bark) with easily obtained non-destructive measurements, i.e., diameter at breast height (D): yi=bi1Dbi2 or with both D and tree height (H): yi=bi1Dbi2Hbi3, bik being the parameters estimated. A common paradigm observed in biomass literature considers that parameter values vary between stands and regions. At the regional scale, however, when comparing national biomass equations to regional biomass equations, our results showed no significant differences between both types of equation. These results contribute to strengthening the allometric theory as an organizing principle for quantifying the relationship between tree size and biomass across spatial scales. In tandem with the allometry theory, we used a soil-canopy model based on Li-Strahler's approach for up-scaling biomass from the tree to stand scale in a mixed hardwood-coniferous forest. Our results indicated that the shadow fraction of Landsat TM reflectance was correlated with stand biomass. However, this model is indebted with heteroscedasticity, meaning that its error increases appreciably when stand biomass density is high.
Monitoring net primary productivity (NPP) and assessing site potential at the landscape level are central issues for sustainable landscape management practice. One of the foundations of classical forestry is the computation of forest productivity at the stand level. This computation of growth potential is usually based on a site index derived from measurements of height and age taken on dominant trees. The site index thus integrates the effect of the three main components of forest productivity: vegetation characteristics, climatic environment and site properties. However useful, site index-based methods cannot discern which part of the overall productivity is due to any of these three components. With an increasing demand for ensuring the sustainability of our forest practices, and with the uncertainty engendered by the possibility of climatic change, we now need tools to quantify the intrinsic productivity of a site, and the effect of external factors on this productivity. The ECOLEAP (extended concentration to link ecophysiology and forest productivity) project address these concerns. The overall objective of the ECOLEAP project is to develop a knowledge base from which tools to predict and monitor forest productivity and health will be developed. More specifically, the project will focus on three specific aspects. The first is the measurement of net primary productivity (NPP) in major eastern forest ecosystems, and, within each ecosystem, across a climate or fertility gradient. The second is the determination of functional relationships between specific biophysical factors, related to site, climate and species composition, and ecosystem NPP. The third is to develop tools to predict and monitor the sustainable potential NPP of major forest ecosystems under natural and managed scenarios. The three major forest types under study in ECOLEAP are the sugar maple, balsam fir and black spruce forests.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.