Dr. Elham Tavakkol Profile

Dr. Elham Tavakkol

at UCLA

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (1)

Proceedings Article | 3 April 2024 Presentation + Paper

Assessing variability in non-contrast CT for the evaluation of stroke: the effect of CT image reconstruction conditions on AI-based CAD measurements of ASPECTS value and hypodense volume

Spencer Welland, Grace Hyun Kim, Anil Yadav, John Hoffman, William Hsu, Matthew Brown, Elham Tavakkol, Kambiz Nael, Michael McNitt-Gray

Proceedings Volume 12927, 1292711 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3006582

KEYWORDS: Computed tomography, CT reconstruction, Medical image reconstruction, Computer aided detection, Image restoration, Artificial intelligence, Visualization, Therapeutics, Ischemia, Neuroimaging

Read Abstract +

Purpose: To rule out hemorrhage, non-contrast CT (NCCT) scans are used for early evaluation of patients with suspected stroke. Recently, artificial intelligence tools have been developed to assist with determining eligibility for reperfusion therapies by automating measurement of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), a 10-point scale with > 7 or ≤ 7 being a threshold for change in functional outcome prediction and higher chance of symptomatic hemorrhage, and hypodense volume. The purpose of this work was to investigate the effects of CT reconstruction kernel and slice thickness on ASPECTS and hypodense volume. Methods: The NCCT series image data of 87 patients imaged with a CT stroke protocol at our institution were reconstructed with 3 kernels (H10s-smooth, H40s-medium, H70h-sharp) and 2 slice thicknesses (1.5mm and 5mm) to create a reference condition (H40s/5mm) and 5 non-reference conditions. Each reconstruction for each patient was analyzed with the Brainomix e-Stroke software (Brainomix, Oxford, England) which yields an ASPECTS value and measure of total hypodense volume (mL). Results: An ASPECTS value was returned for 74 of 87 cases in the reference condition (13 failures). ASPECTS in non-reference conditions changed from that measured in the reference condition for 59 cases, 7 of which changed above or below the clinical threshold of 7 for 3 non-reference conditions. ANOVA tests were performed to compare the differences in protocols, Dunnett’s post-hoc tests were performed after ANOVA, and a significance level of p < 0.05 was defined. There was no significant effect of kernel (p = 0.91), a significant effect of slice thickness (p < 0.01) and no significant interaction between these factors (p = 0.91). Post-hoc tests indicated no significant difference between ASPECTS estimated in the reference and any non-reference conditions. There was a significant effect of kernel (p < 0.01) and slice thickness (p < 0.01) on hypodense volume, however there was no significant interaction between these factors (p = 0.79). Post-hoc tests indicated significantly different hypodense volume measurements for H10s/1.5mm (p = 0.03), H40s/1.5mm (p < 0.01), H70h/5mm (p < 0.01). No significant difference was found in hypodense volume measured in the H10s/5mm condition (p = 0.96). Conclusion: Automated ASPECTS and hypodense volume measurements can be significantly impacted by reconstruction kernel and slice thickness.

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years