Mr. J. Marc Pedulla Profile

J. Marc Pedulla

at National Institute of Standards and Technology

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (3)

Proceedings Article | 24 May 2004 Paper

Improving the uncertainty of photomask linewidth measurements

J. Pedulla, James Potzick, Richard Silver

Proceedings Volume 5375, (2004) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.539142

KEYWORDS: Photomasks, Calibration, Mathematical modeling, Standards development, Metrology, Light scattering, Process modeling, Optical simulations, Microscopes, Semiconducting wafers

Read Abstract +

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is currently developing a photomask linewidth standard (SRM 2059) with a lower expected uncertainty of calibration than the previous NIST standards (SRMs 473, 475, 476). In calibrating these standards, optical simulation modeling has been used to predict the microscope image intensity profiles, which are then compared to the experimental profiles to determine the certified linewidths. Consequently, the total uncertainty in the linewidth calibration is a result of uncertainty components from the optical simulation modeling and uncertainty due to experimental errors or approximations (e.g., tool imaging errors and material characterization errors). Errors of approximation in the simulation model and uncertainty in the parameters used in the model can contribute a large component to the total linewidth uncertainty. We have studied the effects of model parameter variation on measurement uncertainty using several different optical simulation programs that utilize different mathematical techniques. We have also evaluated the effects of chrome edge runout and varying indices of refraction on the linewidth images. There are several experimental parameters that are not ordinarily included in the modeling simulation. For example, the modeling programs assume a uniform illuminating field (e.g., Koehler illumination), ideal optics and perfect optical alignment. In practice, determining whether Koehler illumination has been achieved is difficult, and the optical components and their alignments are never ideal. We will present some techniques for evaluating Koehler illumination and methods to compensate for scattered (flare) light. Any such experimental elements, that are assumed accurate in the modeling, may actually present significant components to the uncertainty and need to be quantitatively estimated. The present state of metrology does not permit the absolute calibration of linewidth standards to the level of uncertainty called for in the semiconductor roadmap. However, there are applications for a linewidth standard and calibration strategies which do not require a NIST certified calibration (e.g., determining measurement precision). In this paper we present various critical elements of a systematic and thorough evaluation of the key components of linewidth uncertainty as well as our methods for evaluating and reducing modeling and experimental uncertainties.

Proceedings Article | 2 June 2003 Paper

Updated NIST photomask linewidth standard

James Potzick, J. Pedulla, Michael Stocker

Proceedings Volume 5038, (2003) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.487735

KEYWORDS: Calibration, Photomasks, Microscopes, Standards development, Ultraviolet radiation, Interferometers, Error analysis, Metrology, Nano opto mechanical systems, Objectives

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 27 December 2002 Paper

New NIST photomask linewidth standard

James Potzick, J. Marc Pedulla, Michael Stocker

Proceedings Volume 4889, (2002) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.467432

KEYWORDS: Calibration, Photomasks, Microscopes, Ultraviolet radiation, Interferometers, Standards development, Metrology, Nano opto mechanical systems, Error analysis, Image processing

Read Abstract +

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years