Mapper Lithography has introduced its first product, the FLX–1200, which is installed at CEA-Leti in Grenoble (France). This is a mask less lithography system, based on massively parallel electron-beam writing with high-speed optical data transport for switching the electron beams. This FLX platform is initially targeted for 1 wph performance for 28 nm technology nodes, but can also be used for less demanding imaging. The electron source currently integrated is capable of scaling to 10 wph at the same resolution performance, which will be implemented by gradually upgrading the illumination optics. The system has an optical alignment system enabling mix-and-match with optical 193 nm immersion systems using standard NVSM marks. The tool at CEA-Leti is in-line with a Sokudo Duo clean track. Mapper Lithography and CEA-Leti are working in collaboration to develop turnkey solution for specific applications.
At previous conferences we have presented imaging results including 28nm node resolution, cross wafer CDu of 2.5nm 3 and a throughput of half a wafer per hour, overhead times included. At this conference we will present results regarding the overlay performance of the FLX-1200.
In figure 2 an initial result towards measuring the overlay performance of the FLX-1200 is shown. We have exposed a wafer twice without unloading the wafer in between exposures. In the first exposure half of a dense dot array is exposed. In the second exposure the remainder of the dense dot array is exposed. After development the wafer has been inspected using a CD-SEM at 480 locations distributed over an area of 100mm x 100mm. For each SEM image the shift of the pattern written in the first exposure relative to the pattern written in the second exposure is measured. Cross wafer this shift is 7 nm u+3s in X and 5 nm u+3s in Y. The next step is to evaluate the impact of unloading and loading of the wafer in between exposures. At the conference the latest results will be presented.
Massively parallel mask-less electron beam lithography (MP-EBL) offers a large intrinsic flexibility at a low cost of ownership in comparison to conventional optical lithography tools. This attractive direct-write technique needs a dedicated data preparation flow to correct both electronic and resist processes. Moreover, Data Prep has to be completed in a short enough time to preserve the flexibility advantage of MP-EBL. While the MP-EBL tools have currently entered an advanced stage of development, this paper will focus on the data preparation side of the work for specifically the MAPPER Lithography FLX-1200 tool [1]-[4], using the ASELTA Nanographics Inscale software. The complete flow as well as the methodology used to achieve a full-field layout data preparation, within an acceptable cycle time, will be presented. Layout used for Data Prep evaluation was one of a 28 nm technology node Metal1 chip with a field size of 26x33mm2, compatible with typical stepper/scanner field sizes and wafer stepping plans. Proximity Effect Correction (PEC) was applied to the entire field, which was then exported as a single file to MAPPER Lithography’s machine format, containing fractured shapes and dose assignments. The Soft Edge beam to beam stitching method was employed in the specific overlap regions defined by the machine format as well. In addition to PEC, verification of the correction was included as part of the overall data preparation cycle time. This verification step was executed on the machine file format to ensure pattern fidelity and accuracy as late in the flow as possible. Verification over the full chip, involving billions of evaluation points, is performed both at nominal conditions and at Process Window corners in order to ensure proper exposure and process latitude. The complete MP-EBL data preparation flow was demonstrated for a 28 nm node Metal1 layout in 37 hours. The final verification step shows that the Edge Placement Error (EPE) is kept below 2.25 nm over an exposure dose variation of 8%.
KEYWORDS: Line width roughness, Lithography, Electron beam lithography, Electron beams, Scanning electron microscopy, Etching, Semiconducting wafers, Neodymium, Silicon, Surface conduction electron emitter displays
The emerging Massively Parallel-Electron Beam Direct Write (MP-EBDW) is an attractive high resolution high throughput lithography technology. As previously shown, Chemically Amplified Resists (CARs) meet process/integration specifications in terms of dose-to-size, resolution, contrast, and energy latitude. However, they are still limited by their line width roughness. To overcome this issue, we tested an alternative advanced non-CAR and showed it brings a substantial gain in sensitivity compared to CAR. We also implemented and assessed in-line post-lithographic treatments for roughness mitigation. For outgassing-reduction purpose, a top-coat layer is added to the total process stack. A new generation top-coat was tested and showed improved printing performances compared to the previous product, especially avoiding dark erosion: SEM cross-section showed a straight pattern profile. A spin-coatable charge dissipation layer based on conductive polyaniline has also been tested for conductivity and lithographic performances, and compatibility experiments revealed that the underlying resist type has to be carefully chosen when using this product. Finally, the Process Of Reference (POR) trilayer stack defined for 5 kV multi-e-beam lithography was successfully etched with well opened and straight patterns, and no lithography-etch bias.
KEYWORDS: Line width roughness, Lithography, Etching, Electron beam lithography, System on a chip, Metals, Scanning electron microscopy, Silicon, Resistance, Extreme ultraviolet
Maskless electron beam lithography is an attractive solution to address sub-90 nm technology nodes with high throughput and manufacturing costs reduction. One of the key challenges is to meet entirely process/integration specifications in terms of resolution, resist sensitivity, roughness and etch transfer into underlayers. In this paper, we evaluate and identify the optimal stack to fit printing performance using e-beam exposures and etch transfer patterning. Besides imaging performance, other key parameters such as outgassing and charge dissipation due to high current density are also considered to fully achieve targets for the machine developed by MAPPER Lithography.
KEYWORDS: Lithography, Electron beam lithography, Silicon, Point spread functions, Scanning electron microscopy, Critical dimension metrology, 3D modeling, Information technology, Etching, Monte Carlo methods
In addition to sub-20 nm technology nodes, multi-beam lithography at low-energy has also the capability to address mature CMOS technologies [130-45nm nodes] with high throughput and significant manufacturing costs reduction. It requires both “fast” resists for throughput gain and cost of ownership and “thick” resists matched with the current post-lithography processes such as etching and implant steps. We successfully demonstrated patterning of 45-130 nm nodes structures on different thick resists (up to 160 nm) with a 5 keV Mapper pre-alpha tool. In parallel, we developed a theoretical model to simulate 3D patterning showing good agreement with our experimental results.
The MATRIX platform integrates new types of modules for handling and alignment capability and this represents two new and innovative aspects for multi-beam lithography. Results on performances in terms of robustness of the different modules in real manufacturing conditions, including the interface of the MATRIX platform with the SOKUDO DUO track will be reported. A new type of alignment solution was developed by MAPPER. This paper will show the first results on alignment sensor repeatability. Preliminary results on the overlay performance of the MATRIX platform will be presented and discussion will be engaged to position the MAPPER alignment concept with respect to the ITRS roadmap expectations.
MAPPER Lithography is developing a maskless lithography technology based on massively-parallel electron-beam
writing. In order to reduce costs and to minimize the footprint of this tool a new alignment sensor has been developed;
based on technologies used for DVD optical heads. A wafer with an alignment mark is scanned with the sensor, resulting
in an intensity pattern versus position. From this pattern the mark position can be calculated.
Evaluations have been made over the performance of this type of sensor using different mark designs at several
lithography process steps for FEOL and BEOL manufacturing. It has been shown that sub-nanometer reproducibility
(3σ std) of alignment mark readings can be achieved while being robust against various process steps.
KEYWORDS: Optical alignment, System on a chip, Lithography, Semiconducting wafers, Image processing, Optical lithography, Scanning electron microscopy, Scanners, Signal processing, Photoresist processing
Self Aligned Double Patterning (SADP) is now widely accepted as a viable technology for the further extension of
193nm immersion lithography towards the 22nm /18nm technology nodes. SADP was primary introduced for the
manufacturing of flash memory due to its 1D design geometry. However, SADP is now becoming a main stream
technology for advanced technology nodes for logic product.
SADP results in alignment marks with reduced image contrast after completion of spacer patterning.
Consequently there is an elevated risk that the alignment performance of the cut lithography layer on the spacer [1]
may be negatively impacted. Initial studies indicate that it may be necessary to consider new mark designs. In this
paper, we will evaluate different types of SADP processes with the alignment system of the Nikon S620D and
S621D immersion scanner. We will discuss the performances and the differences observed due to the SADP
materials.
Included in this study is an intensive characterization of the morphology of the spacer after SADP process. We
will use for this a 3D-AFM from Insight, and characterize the spacer profile of the spacer. Using a standard AFM
microscope, we can characterize the surface roughness in the inner and the outer part of the wafer. The self aligned
spacer process results in asymmetric spacers. Two types of surface (inside and outside) of the spacer are formed.
The impact of this asymmetry is also assessed. The roughness difference, between the two parts, will play an
important roll in the alignment contrast.
Double patterning with Spacer (DPS) is now widely accepted as a viable technology for the further extension of
193nm lithography towards the 22nm /18nm technology nodes. DPS was primary introduced for the manufacturing
of flash memory due to its 1D design geometry. However, DPS is now becoming a main stream technology for
advanced technology nodes for logic product.
DPS results in alignment and overlay marks with reduced image contrast after completion of spacer patterning.
Consequently there is an elevated risk that the overlay performance of the cut lithography layer on the spacer [1]
may be negatively impacted. Initial studies indicate that it may be necessary to consider new mark designs. In this
paper, we discuss the basic design of the Nikon alignment marks and make a statistical assessment of their relative
performance.
The self aligned spacer process results in asymmetric spacers. That are two types of surface (inside and outside)
of the spacer are formed. The impact of this asymmetry is also being assessed. Mark geometries are characterized
with 3D-AFM measurement and alignment / overlay performance analysis.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.