|
INTRODUCTIONThe Optics course is a basic course for the students of the Optoelectronic Information Science and Engineering major. Many teachers have carried out in-depth research on the curriculum teaching. For example, Xu Jiawen[1] gave recommendations for teaching by comparing the domestic and international teaching mode. Li Yijun et al. [2] put forward their own views on the teaching content and teaching methods. Some scholars put forward the application of modern teaching methods in the course teaching to promote students’ learning [3]. We conduct a survey of our students to know their understanding of the curriculum and their attitudes towards learning. We identify the factors that affect student learning, and find out the ways to improve the students’ learning by setting up the website of the course, using the website to carry out the teaching and guiding the students to study. 1.QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY AND ANALYSISIn order to understand the learning situation of students’ of Optics and discover the problems in teaching, we have conducted a questionnaire survey on the three grades of students in optoelectronic information science and engineering, involving a total of 224 students from grade2015, 2014 and 2013. We distributed 224 questionnaires, and 209 were recovered. The questionnaire is mainly from the following aspects: to understand students’ interest in the course; to understand the reasons why students encounter difficulties in learning; to understand the expectations of students in modern teaching methods. Through an analysis of the collected questionnaires, we focus on the summary from three aspects to understand the situation of students’ learning. 1.1Overall situationWe present the questionnaire on the overall situation of the curriculum listed in Table 1. The questionnaire asked students “Are you interested in optics?”, “Do you think optics is important?”, the two questions are to understand the students’ understanding of the curriculum. The questionnaire asked “Is the teacher enough time to teach?”, “Do you think positively in class?”, “Can you keep up with the teacher’s progress during class?”. We want to understand the students in the classroom lectures situation with these three problems. The questionnaire asked students whether they would review after class in order to understand the students’ after-school review situation. We ask students to make a single choice of these questions from the three options: Yes, No, or Do not know. Table 1Students’ Understanding of Curriculum
The choices of students tell us that they are very interested in the course. The importance of the course also has been understood. They are willing to think positively but sometimes they fell distressed, because they can not keep up with teacher, and content. 1.2Factors affecting learningIn the questionnaire, we set up several factors that affect students’ learning, mainly to analyze the reasons students encounter difficulties in learning. Students make multiple choices. The results are shown in Figure 1. The factors that affect the students’ learning are mainly the abstraction of the optical content, and the students’ difficulties in some processes and certain phenomena. There are few factors in terms of teachers’ expression, teaching materials and hours. It confirms the students’ willingness to think positively but keeping up with the teacher’s progress is somewhat difficult because of the lack of understanding. Although more students are willing to review after class to make up for the lack of class time, the problem is worthy of our attention. 1.3Teaching methods expectedIn this regard, we have listed a number of teaching methods for students to choose, so that they can choose methods to promote learning teaching. The choices of students are shown in Figure 2. From the student’s choice, we can know that students show little interest in the traditional blackboard teaching, they are inclined to teachers’ using of multimedia teaching methods. Many students hope that the application of teaching courseware expands the amount of knowledge. They hope to promote understanding through video, teaching demonstration and other means. 2.CREATING NETWORK TEACHING PLATFORMNow that there’s no problem in the students’ learning attitude, we can enhance the teaching effect based on the existing problemes. We can use the network platform for this work. The network teaching platform not only contains more teaching resources but also provides students with interactive learning platform. We can try to use teaching courseware in class. When we are teaching with the multimedia courseware, we can link to the course site. We enter different areas of the site according to different course contents, such as experimental demonstration, the videos of principle, process simulation and other teaching methods which students have expected. The perfect combination of teaching site and classroom teaching can mobilize students’ enthusiasm of listening to lectures. 3.USING OF FLEXIBLE TEACHING METHODSIn the process of classroom teaching, teachers can choose different modern teaching methods based on the established teaching platform. They can extract the teaching resources through courseware, according to the characteristics of the course content. 3.1Use diagrams to present principles and phenomenaWe illustrate abstract principles and phenomena by using the instructional resources which have been uploaded in the instructional website duing the courseware. Take the “Huygens - Fresnel principle” as an example. When we explain the principle using language, it is not clear enough and will make students understand the deviation. This will further affect the subsequent study of students. We can extract the website resources in class to explain this principle of dynamic map and the principle of combining pictures(Figure 3). So that students will be able to master this principle. 3.2Use procedures to simulate physical processesIn addition to the schematic diagram, we adopt different teaching methods for different problems. For example, we will encounter some problems due to changes in the conclusions when the parameters have been changed. For these problems, we can use MATLAB, ZEMAX and other software to write a simple program, it will be placed in the course website. During the course of teaching, the program can be invoked, and the students are clearly explained. For example, when we talk about double-slit interference, although a formula can be used to calculate the relationship between the interference pattern with the distance of the double-slit d, the distance from the slit to the receiving screen D, and the wavelength λ, it is not intuitive. To solve this problem, we can use MATLAB to write a program. We change the physical quantities d, D and λ in class to get different interference patterns and light intensity distribution. We allow students to visually feel the brightness of stripes, stripe width and other changes when the separation distance and other parameters have been changed. (Figure 4-6) This is very helpful in explaining the characteristics that affect the double-slit interference fringes. At present, the laser scanning system has been widely used in a variety of occasions, such as laser marking, laser etching, three-dimensional contour scanner, laser bar code scanners and so on. When it comes to the content of optical system design, it is difficult to grasp directly. We can use ZEMAX software to simulate in class. For example, when we need to explain the designing of a laser scanning system, we can use the program which has been prepared by the ZEMAX software in class, enter the following data in the ZEMAX lens editor: We can see the shadow map by shade model. Here are given five deflection angles which can be seen that different angles on the screen focus on different degrees (Figure 8). It is necessary to optimize the initial structure of the laser scanning system in order to focus each angle on the screen. The optimized shadow map is shown below. Specifically, we set the lens’s radius of curvature as a variable, and the conic coefficient of the first face to -1. It can be optimized by the default evaluation tool in Merit Function. By optimizing we can see that there are many improvements in the degree of focusing on the screen at each angle, which can also be clearly seen from the dot plot below.(Figure 9) Through the demonstration of direct operation in class, students will be greatly improved. 3.3Explain the course content with the experimental videoWe can use videos to explain some of the knowledge. We have the corresponding experimental equipment in the laboratory but can not be carried out in the classroom. When teaching holograms, teachers can operate and take video recordings using a laboratory holographic device and play them in class. Students can visualize holographic conditions and show holographic images of network resources. They will be able to understand the problem of holography well. 4.CONCLUSIONTeachers establish a course website and use the web resources effectively for teaching. Students can solve a series of difficulties encountered in the optical study. After the establishment of the website, students can extend learning from in-class learning to after-class learning, to further improve their effect of optical learning and lay a solid foundation for further study of the professional courses. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis work was supported by Revitalization Plan of Anhui Province (Grant No.2013zytz064), Anhui Province Key Teaching Research Project (Grant No.2016jyxm0974), Huangshan University Teaching Research Project (Grant No.2016JXYJ19), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11305074). REFERENCESXU Jia—wen,
“Reflection and practice about Teaching Modes of Applied Optics Course,”
Journal of Higher Education Research, Vol, 39
(1), 115
–120
(2016). Google Scholar
LI Yi-jun,
“Research and Practice on the teaching reform of optics course in Colleges and Universities,”
Physics and Engineering, Vol, 23
(5), 58
–60
(2013). Google Scholar
Guo Jing,
“Improve engineering optics teaching with modern teaching methods,”
China Modern Educational Equipment, 1 57
–59
(2010). Google Scholar
|