|
1.INTRODUCTIONAs an established component in terrestrial signal-processing and telecom systems, the 1550nm DFB laser is potentially a key enabling technology in low-Earth-orbit (LEO) downlinks, inter-satellite relays, LEO constellations, and photonic telecom payloads. Previous development by Gooch & Housego [1] has reached the finished module shown in Figure 1. Such modules have a DFB laser diode emitting at 1550nm, a thermo-electric cooler (TEC) for maintaining the laser diode at constant temperature, a 14-pin butterfly-housing, full hermeticity attained via laser-welding technology, and a polarisation-maintaining fibre pigtail. Combined with a constant (derated) laser-drive specification of 375mA, the modules also offer 32dB of optical isolation and 3.2GHz of 3dB-bandwidth for high-speed direct data modulation. In this paper, we report on the completion of pre-test module characterisation, the conduct of a full program of ESCC-23201-compliant [2] space validation, and the meticulous evaluation of device screening and reliability analysis that would indicate suitability for space-qualified operation. 2.PRE-TEST FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCEFollowing pre-cap inspection, fine and gross leak testing, and PIND, an investigation of functional performance yielded the key data shown in Figure 2. The L(I) curves at 375mA indicate an ex-fibre power of >90mW, while the spectra confirm a side-mode-suppression ratio of >50dB. The linewidth measurements follow the methodology of the delayed self-homodyne interferometer which shifts the resultant spectra to the 80MHz range and wherein the optical linewidth is half that of the electrical linewidth. The laser linewidth is thus confirmed as between 200kHz and 1000kHz. For RIN, all measurements are less than -150dB/Hz. For electric power, total consumption is <4.1W at 375mA laser-drive current and 65°C housing temperature. Such a notably low consumption is attributed to the internal sub-assembly arrangement, which optimises the temperature control efficiency. It is further evident that at 25°C housing temperature, the power consumption is dominated by the laser, and the TEC contribution dominates only at much higher housing temperatures. Table 1 summarises the performance data. Table 1.Pre-test functional performance.
The pre-test functional data are thus in comfortable compliance with the agreed Detail Specification. 3.VALIDATION PERFORMANCEBy following the ESCC-23201 evaluation test program for laser diodes [2], the scope of the validation is as defined in Figure 3, covering 57 unscreened modules. This number is slightly lower than in [2] as, for each subgroup, the number of parts is optimised for relevancy of results. 3.1Evaluation plan methodologyWith the lot of 57 laser modules considered as a representative manufacturing population, the evaluation started with an initial characterisation encompassing L(I), V(I), spectrum, low level I(V), relative intensity noise (RIN) and linewidth. The laser diodes were accordingly found to have nominal ex-fibre powers between 70 and 100mW, and threshold currents between 35mA and 65mA. Then, under evaluation testing, measurements were repeated at each test step, allowing any slight variation in the laser parameters to be determined. To allow assessment of the reliability of the technology, the Figure 3 test groups encompass step-stressing, environmental testing, irradiation, electro-optic capability and endurance. 3.2Step-stress sub-groupThis concerned an evaluation of the effects of step-stressing of laser temperature between -25°C and 50°C, and output power above 100mW (with the laser current ranging from 450mA to 525mA). No major defect was noted and no significant drift was observed on the laser performance. Figure 4 illustrates the monitoring of output power drift with time. 3.3Environmental sub-groupMechanical testing concerned 30g rms random vibration followed by half-sine shocks from 500g/1ms up to 1500g/0.5ms; Figure 5a shows samples subjected to random vibration. Temperature cycling concerned 500 rapid thermal cycles between -55°C and 70°C with an average ramp of 15 deg/min and dwell time of 15 minutes. Depressurisation involved rapid pressure cycling down to 10mbar over 5 seconds at ambient temperature, and with the laser diodes driven at 375mA and 30°C. Low temperature testing concerned 2000h of non-biased storage at -55°C. Thermal vacuum testing comprised 1000h of secondary vacuum at <10-5 mbar with the laser diodes driven at 375mA and 30°C, and the module case temperature held at 65°C. Humidity testing concerned 240h of 85°C/85% damp heat, followed by -10°C to +50°C temperature cycling around the dew point. For all the environmental tests, the modules showed no significant drifts except for the shock test where the limit is 1000g/0.5ms, and rapid thermal cycling wherein one of three laser diodes failed, indicating sensitivity of the module to fast temperature variation. The latter sensitivity is to be screened as discussed in Section 4. 3.4Irradiation sub-groupUnder radiation testing, both ionising dose and non-ionising dose were considered. The ionising dose was provided by gamma irradiation (total dose of 100 krads), whereas the non-ionising dose was provided by proton irradiation (total fluence of 1012 p+/cm2 for an energy of 30 MeV). After both gamma and proton irradiation, no significant drift was observed on the laser diode. As expected, only the monitoring photodiode drifted after proton exposure. Figure 5b shows the samples inside the gamma radiation chamber. 3.5Electro-optic sub-groupIn this group, 4 types of tests were concerned. First, characterisation was conducted at extreme temperatures of -20°C and +65°C. No major issues were encountered. Second, characterisation was conducted under secondary vacuum (around 10-5mbar) under various temperatures of laser-diode and module-case. Relative to similar measurements in air, no differences were noted. The spectra given in Figure 6 illustrate the effect of different temperatures of laser-diode and module-case. Third, electro-static discharge sensitivity was evaluated following the Human Body Model (HBM) of MIL-STD-883 standard, method 3015 [3]. As per Figure 7, the tested laser modules showed no degradation up to the 8kV step. Fourth, catastrophic optical damage (COD) was investigated wherein the laser current is increased until failure and the forward voltage, optical power and laser temperature were continuously monitored. The resultant L(I) curves are shown in Figure 8. We note the typical L(I) bell shape in which the optical signal extinguishes after a laser current of 1A and is reversible thereafter; this shows that the laser diode can be driven up to 1.8A without degradation and verifies its robustness to high electrical current. 3.6Endurance sub-groupLife-testing was performed on 15 laser modules at a case temperature of 65°C for 5000h. The laser diode was driven at a current of 375mA and a temperature of 30°C. The in-situ monitoring of the optical power is represented by Figure 9. The stability of the laser diodes illustrated by Figure 9 indicates minimal drift over the 5000h life-test. 3.7Evaluation test conclusionWith optical output power exceeding 70mW, no catastrophic failures were encountered, and the samples were shown to be robust to thermo-mechanical as well as to radiation tests. With potential space compliance summarised as in Table 2, two significant points concern the mechanical shock level which is limited to 1000g/0.5ms, and the coupling sensitivity to rapid temperature change. Near-term addressing of the latter point is by screening, as discussed in Section 4. Table 2.A summary of ESCC-23201 [2] based evaluation.
4.PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AND RELIABILITY PREDICTION4.1IntroductionFor validation-tested devices to be assured of fulfilling mission profiles, their random failure rate must be below the maximum accepted rate, and their Mean-Time-To-Failure (MTTF) for parametric wear-out must be greater than the mission lifetime. Figure 6 is a schematic of the bathtub curve and the conditions to be fulfilled. According to the Telcordia quality standard [4], the time to failure τ for laser diodes follows two types of models:
where τo is a constant, Ea_random (the activation energy for random failure) =0.35eV, k (Boltzmann’s constant) =8.617×10-5eV/K, Twave is the temperature of the laser diode chip (as set by the TEC), Rth (the thermal resistance of the laser diode) is evaluated by a non-destructive method to be in the range [8.8 K/W, 10.4 K/W], Inom and Vnom are the nominal laser current and voltage biasing conditions, Pout is the nominal optical output power, Iburnout is the laser current that leads to instantaneous catastrophic failure, and Ea_wearout (the activation energy for wear-out failure) =0.4eV. In particular, we can note that by removing the operational bias factor (Inom/Iburnout)-2 from Equation 1b, τwearout becomes consistent with an Arrhenius (pure thermal) law. However, our module’s components are carefully selected, characterised, and assembled according to space-quality standards (in particular ECSS-Q-ST-60-05 [5]) and do not exhibit random failure. Hence only Equation-1b wear-out applies. Also, with spectral stability ensured through operating the laser diode at constant current and temperature, and with change in dynamic line-width (or frequency chirp) having already demonstrated strong technological stability, our work highlights ex-fibre power Pout is the only affected parameter. This is seen to seen, to a very limited extent, during life-testing of the laser diode. Such degradation differs from that in other electronic devices due to the recombination of electron-hole pairs and the presence of high optical densities within the active region and at the output facet [6]. The applicable degradation mechanisms are (i) defect formation in the active region, and (ii) degradation of current-confining junctions [7]. As first observed in AIGaAs lasers and LEDs, the defect structures generally comprise dark spot defects (DSDs) and the dark line defects (DLDs) of the (100) crystal direction. Operation at high injected current densities creates high-energy electrons and holes, thermal gradients, potential for strain fields, and a high non-radiative recombination rate inside the active region. This, in turn, can promote the motion, multiplication, and growth of isolated defects into clusters. Although InGaAsP/InP buried double heterostructure laser diodes are less vulnerable to some of the dominant degradations mechanisms of other technologies (e.g. GaAs, InGaAs, InP, etc) [8], [9], the fact remains that reliability can still be critical according to the specific epitaxial growth, blocking layers, and (in DFB lasers) the selectivity of the engraving of the Bragg grating. In particular, in empiric studies on the technology by Fukuda et al. [10], it was found that activation energies for generating DSDs and DLDs are respectively 0.16eV and 0.2eV, that the generation time of the first DSD depends strongly on the operating current density, and that the time to failure follows the factor exp(A · J2), where A is a constant and J is the current density. Since, in addition to temperature, degradation is enhanced by increasing the laser current and output power, aging studies are conducted in one of the following two modes of operation. The first is constant current aging – often referred to as ACC mode (automatic current control) – where the laser current is held constant for the duration of the test. The second is constant power aging, which is often referred to as APC mode (automatic power control). Under APC, the optical output power is measured either with an external photodetector or by using an internal monitor photodiode if one is available within the laser package, and this power is then held constant by continuously adjusting the laser current as required to maintain constant output power. While constant power aging is frequently used as a mimic of typical operation, our work uses constant current because this mode is essential to achieving the specified operating-wavelength of within ±0.1nm. In practice, difficulties in laser diode life testing arise from temperature instability, equipment measurement and control instability, equipment reliability, and power failures. A challenge associated with temperature control is the self-heating of the laser during operation. The temperature elevation at junction level is in the range [8K, 10K] at the maximum rated bias current of 375mA (and bias voltage of 2.4V). Additionally, heat-sink temperature fluctuations as small as 0.1°C manifest as noise in the measurement of optical power due to the temperature sensitivity of laser output power at a given current. Finally, if an external photodetector is used to measure optical output power, its temperature must also be controlled to ensure stable measurements. Laser diode life test studies require an accurate measurement of changes in laser operating parameters as small as a few percent over thousands of hours. Consequently, the stability of the measurement equipment must be on the order of 0.1% per 1000 hours. In most locations, occasional electrical power failures are inevitable during the course of a multi-thousand-hour life-test study. In many cases, it is impractical to provide battery backup systems due to the high power required for heating in life test systems. As a result, the life test system must handle power failures without damage to the lasers, and must be able to resume a test precisely after power is restored. To model the resultant changes in ex-fibre power Pout, we follow [11] wherein the Eyring law of Equation 1b is extended via the so-called Boltzmann-Arrhenius-Zhurkov (BAZ) model. Hence, the time to failure τ for the combined action of an elevated temperature T and external stress represents S is written as in Equation 1c. where S is can be any stimulus or group of stimuli (such a voltage, current, signal input, irradiation, etc), τ A is a pre-factor, γ is a factor of loading characterising the role of the level of stress, and the product γ · S is the stress per unit volume and is measured in the same units as the activation energy Ea. By considering multiple stresses including temperature, the approach offers the establishment of a unified reliability model for electronic devices operating under multiple-stress harsh environments; whether submarine, nuclear, on the ground, in transport, or in aerospace. The changes in ex-fibre power Pout, which are also seen under temperature cycling, can be mitigated by screening. According to the Telcordia standard [12], laser modules should normally be 100% screened according to:
In terms of production burn-in screening, the challenge is to achieve high manufacturing throughput and accurate measurements at very low cost. The two most common strategies are the following:
4.2Application and resultsWith regard to Equation 1b, we consider that the expression suffers a lack of precision at the limit when the current flow is zero since the implied infinite time to failure at Inom=0 is inconsistent with the Arrhenius law limit. To overcome this contradiction, we propose to update the Eyring model as in Equation 1d. where, by using the ratio (Iburnout-Inom)/Iburnout instead of Inom/Iburnout, a value of 1 is obtained at Inom=0 which makes τwearout consistent with the Arrhenius (pure thermal) law of Equation 1a. The power factor n is then calculated by equivalence to Equation 2b, with the result obtained given in Equation 1e. A life-test sequence was performed on 15 DFB laser modules at case temperature, Tcase = 65°C, for 5000 hours. Also, the laser current Inom and laser temperature Twave were set at constant respective values of 375mA and 30°C. We measured the devices at interim times during this ACC stress. A linear drift of output power from 1000 to 5000h was observed with a maximum value close to 4%. Based on a median ranking parameter and the time to failure ti for a part i, linearly extrapolated to reach the 30% drift, a Weibull plot was obtained as shown in Figure 7. The analysis shows the lot of devices to be homogeneous, and extracts a Weibull β parameter of β=2.61. Extracted data for a range of ΔPout values are in Table 3. Table 3.Extracted reliability data using Inom=375mA, Twave=30°C and Tcase=65°C for various values of ΔPout.
Other values of predicted MTTF and τwearout may be obtained through changed values of current (Inom) and temperature (Twave) applied to the laser diode. First, Equation 1c may be simplified by noting that the temperature of the junction Tj of the laser diode is given by Equation 2. Then, considering user and test-stress levels of laser current and junction temperature (respectively Iuser, Istress, Tj_user and Tj_stress), we may deduce an accelerating factor AF from Equations 1c, 1d and 2 as given in Equation 3: With Ea=0.4eV as manufacturer data, and user values reduced to Iuser=275mA and Twave_user=20°C, we may then deduce AF as 3.27 and update the Table-3 data as in Table 4. Table 4.Updated MTTF and failure rate data considering Inom=275mA and Twave=20°C.
Accordingly, we demonstrate an MTTF of >15 years under Inom=275mA and Twave=20°C operating conditions, taking ΔPout=-30% as an acceptable failure criterion. Nevertheless, these preliminary data are a first assessment of MTTF and FIT values, and need to be consolidated with additional steady-state life-testing as follows:
To quantify the degradation of the laser diode with junction temperature Tj, we empirically define the laser threshold current Ith and the external differential quantum efficiency ηD as in Equation 4. where T0=198K, T1=178K, I0=10.2mA and η0=1.32W/A. To permit quantification of all potential manufacturing, testing and operational failures of the module’s laser diode (whether arising from electrical biasing, atmospheric, radiation-based, thermo-mechanical, or other applied environmental stresses), we implement the BAZ-modelling approach by setting x%=Inom/Iburnout within Equation 1d, and then using Equation 2 to give: We now set to obtain It is thus seen that the effective activation energy depends on stress condition applied, and varies linearly with the current bias applied as a first approximation. As a numerical example, we can assess γI = 0.246 and Ea_eff = 0.347 eV based on the following typical data: Twave=20°C, Inom=375mA (=75%of the maximum 500mA rating), Ith=50mA, Vnom=2.4V, n=3.8, Ea=0.4eV, Rth=9.6K/W, Pout=80mW, and Iburnout=900mA. Figure 8 represents the effective activation energy Ea_eff as function of the stress condition (x%=Inom/Iburnout) applied. Accordingly, Ea_eff decreases with x%=Inom/Iburnout. 4.3Optimising the testing methodology for new laser-diode technologyFollowing Section 4.2, we recommend optimising the BAZ-model as per the following steps: Step 1: Characterise the laser-diode lot in chip form, and at module level after screening, comprising:
Step 2: Perform step-stressing according to Table 5, where 15 test devices and 2 extra control devices (CD) are suggested. Table 5.Proposed modification to the step-stress testing of reference [2], including an update to the number of devices.
Step 3: As consolidated from step-stress data to achieve more than 50% failure in a short period of time (typically close to 1000h), define an accelerated endurance program. Each test sequence is to include at least 6 devices, and involve 3 Twave, temperatures and 3 Inom biasing conditions, that are proposed to be 50°C, 80°C, 100°C, 350mA, 375mA and 400mA. Perform testing and use control devices for every interim measurement. Use high temperature data to calculate Ea: this is the baseline of the BAZ model (use chip on carrier for simplification of measurement). Calculate values of n and γ. Step 4: Repeat above methodology, where appropriate, for other stressing parameters – e.g. output power (may be done simultaneously as for current), and irradiation. 4.4Key outcomes and proposalsGuaranteed reliability: Under, for example, at Inom=275mA and Twave=20°C, the analysis of Section 4.2 predicts <10% drift of lasing current threshold, <30% drift of output power, within ±0.1nm drift of wavelength, and a 15yr MTTF. Space-quality lot validation: For a 15-year operating life and an acceptable quality limit of 0.65%, we propose steady-state life-testing as in Table 6, and acceptable parametric drifts as in Table 7. Table 6.Steady-state life-testing for lot validation.
Table 7.Acceptable parametric drifts for lot validation.
Screening and burn-in: Based on the obtained evaluation test data (Section 3), we recommend the following order of conditioning to be completed on a 100% basis for space lot delivery:
Table 8.Burn-in conditions.
Maximum ratings: We propose these, from known device heritage and Section-3 data, as in Table 9. Table 9.Absolute maximum ratings for some important parameters.
Operational ratings: Table 10 shows the main operational ratings for space applications, listed by key component. Table 10.Some key operational ratings, where start-of-life and Tcase ∈[0°C, 50°C] apply unless otherwise specified.
Reliability testing methodology for new laser-diode technology: For this, we make the recommended optimisations as per Section 4.3. 5.TECHNOLOGICAL OUTLOOKThe validation-tested modules, as described, are intended to be supplied until at least 2023. Concurrent end-user investigations and in-flight mission demonstrations would assist the drive towards acceptance as a space-qualified product, suited to listing on the European Preferred Parts List. For the longer-term growth of global space initiatives, we anticipate a continuing program of supply that would feature an upgrading of design for improved specification and performance, reduced need for screening, and space-compatible delta qualification. 6.CONCLUSIONSWe have presented characterisation and space-validation results on a 1550nm DFB laser diode module manufactured by Gooch & Housego according to a program of work funded by the European Space Agency. In the near-term, excellent results are obtained in all critical areas that would allow space validation to be granted. Modules are available for immediate supply into global space markets. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis work has been supported by the European Space Agency through the ECI program “Space validation of DFB laser module at 1.55 μm” (ESA contract number 4000110310). We gratefully acknowledge ESA/ESTEC Technical Officer M. Zahir for his support and technical guidance during contract execution. REFERENCESMacDougall, J., Naylor, P., Elder, J., Henderson, P., Stampoulidis, L., Barbero, J., Kehayas, E.,
“Optoelectronic modules for space applications,”
in Proc. SPIE,
10562
(2017). Google Scholar
ESCC, Evaluation test program guidelines for laser diode modules, ESCC basic specification 23201, 1
–22 ESA, Noordwijk
(2014). Google Scholar
“Test Method Standard – Microcircuits,”
(2018) http://www.landandmaritime.dla.mil/programs/milspec/ListDocs.aspx?BasicDoc=MIL-STD-883 Google Scholar
Reliability prediction procedure for electronic equipment, SR-332, Ericsson(2016). Google Scholar
ECSS, Space product assurance: Generic procurement requirements for hybrids, ECSS-Q-ST-60-05, 1
–77 ESA, Noordwijk
(2009). Google Scholar
Mendizabal, L., Fiabilité des diodes laser DFB 1,55 μm pour des applications de télécommunication: Approche statistique et interaction composant-système, Bordeaux
(2006). Google Scholar
Agrawal, G. P., and Dutta, N. K., Semiconductor lasers, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell
(1993). Google Scholar
Fukuda, M., Reliability and degradation of semiconductor lasers and LEDs, Artech House, Boston & London
(1991). Google Scholar
Mendizabal, L., Bechou, L., Deshayes, Y., Verdier, F., Danto, Y., Lafitte, D., Goudard, J., and Loué, F.,
“Study of influence of failure modes on lifetime distribution prediction of 1.55 μm DFB Laser diodes using weak drift of monitored parameters during ageing test,”
Microelectronics Reliability Journal, 44
(9-11), 1337
–1342
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2004.07.025 Google Scholar
Fukuda, M., Wakita, K., Iwane, G.,
“Dark defects in InGaAsP/InP double heterostructure lasers under accelerated aging,”
Journal of Applied Physics, 54 1246
(1983). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.332186 Google Scholar
Bensoussan A., Suhir, E., Henderson, P., and Zahir, M.,
“A unified multiple stress reliability model for microelectronic devices — Application to 1.55 μm DFB laser diode module for space validation,”
in Proc. 26th European Symposium on Reliability of Electron Devices,
1729
–1735
(2015). Google Scholar
Reliability assurance for optoelectronic devices, GR-468-CORE, Ericsson(2004). Google Scholar
|