Comparison of radiometric and chemical detection sensitivities for heterodyne and direct detection DIAL

Daniel C. Senft; Diego F. Pierrottet

doi:10.1117/12.518593

27 February 2004 Comparison of radiometric and chemical detection sensitivities for heterodyne and direct detection DIAL

Daniel C. Senft, Diego F. Pierrottet

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 5268, Chemical and Biological Standoff Detection; (2004) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.518593
Event: Optical Technologies for Industrial, Environmental, and Biological Sensing, 2003, Providence, RI, United States

Abstract

A high repetition rate, wavelength agile CO₂ laser has been developed at the Air Force Research Laboratory for use as a local oscillator in a heterodyne detection receiver. Rapid wavelength selection is required for measurements of airborne chemical vapors using the differential absorption lidar (DIAL) technique. Acousto-optic modulators are used in the local oscillator to tune between different wavelengths at high speeds (greater than 100 Hz) without the need for moving mechanical parts. Other advantages obtained by the use of acousto-optic modulators are laser output power control per wavelength and rugged packaging for field applications. A series of experiments to simultaneously characterize the radiometric and chemical detection sensitivities of heterodyne and direct detection DIAL systems is being performed at Kirtland AFB, NM, and will be described. The wavelength agile local oscillator (WALO) has been incorporated into a heterodyne receiver, with the Laser Airborne Remote Sensing (LARS) system providing the laser transmitter and direct detection receiver. The experiment series is studying radiometric issues, spread spectrum operation, the effects of target-induced speckle, and the influence of atmospheric turbulence for both detection mechanisms. Measurements are being performed over a horizontal path at standoff ranges of 4 to 15 km, using both natural and man-made targets. Comparisons of the heterodyne and direct detection radiometric and chemometric results will be presented, and contrasted with predictions from simulations and models. The results will also be discussed in terms of the implications for fielding operational DIAL systems.

Citation Download Citation

Daniel C. Senft and Diego F. Pierrottet "Comparison of radiometric and chemical detection sensitivities for heterodyne and direct detection DIAL", Proc. SPIE 5268, Chemical and Biological Standoff Detection, (27 February 2004); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.518593

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
11 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Heterodyning

Receivers

Signal to noise ratio

Absorption

Signal detection

Chemical detection

Oscillators

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years