|
1.IntroductionMicroscopic surgery of middle ear structures requires minimal trauma to the tissue involved to preserve hearing and to avoid damage to the vestibular organ and the facial nerve. In otosclerosis, a condition in which the annular ligament suspending the stapes footplate in the oval niche is fixed, stapedotomy is performed to replace the stapes with a prosthesis joined to the incus, while the distal end is coupled to the inner ear by fenestrating the stapes footplate. This requires precise perforation of the stapes footplate, which is best accomplished by a no-touch technique. Thus, lasers have been introduced to stapes surgery at an early stage. First experimental results with an Nd:YAG laser were published in 1967 by Sataloff.1 The first clinical use of an Argon laser for stapedotomy was published by Palva2 and by Perkins.3 Since then, various lasers, such as the Argon, 4, 5, 6, 7 the (Refs. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12), the KTP (Refs. 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18), and the Erbium:YAG (Refs. 19, 23) have been used in in vitro and in vivo settings, while the Er:YSGG (Refs. 24, 25), Holmium:YAG (Refs. 24, 26), the (excimer) (Ref. 24), and the diode laser27 have been evaluated in vitro only. The variety of laser systems in use reflects the fact that many of the present systems are suitable but none possesses ideal properties for middle ear applications. In particular, the fact that laser energy in the visible light range, as emitted by the Argon and KTP , is absorbed only very little by clear fluid has raised concerns on heating of inner ear structures, such as the perilymph,12, 18, 28 the facial nerve, or unwanted irradiation of the saccular macula, a part of the vestibular organ that is situated in direct line about 1.7 to behind the stapes footplate.29 On the other hand, as laser energy is readily absorbed by fluids, the amount of temperature rise of the perilymph itself and its impact on inner ear function has been subject to further investigations.16, 28, 30 While lasers operated in cw mode were shown to perform stapedotomy procedures safely, there has been an issue with lasers operating in the so-called superpulse mode, as this entails pressure transients that are potentially harmful to the sensory compound action potential of the outer and inner hair cells.30, 31, 32 Photoablative systems such as the Er:YAG laser cause little thermal effects and are able to ablate bone in a precise and bloodless manner, but create pressure transients which could result in acoustic trauma.19, 20, 31 However, even with a great number of pitfalls, laser surgery of the stapes footplate has been proven to be beneficial in terms of hearing outcome compared to mechanical drilling11, 32 in primary surgery and even more in revision surgery, as the diseased ear is even more vulnerable to mechanical stress induced by conventional surgery.17, 33 In some cases, revision surgery has been made possible only with a laser that otherwise would have been contraindicated.17 As the dilemma between thermal load and mechanical stress remains unsolved, the safety of laser surgery for the middle ear has been accomplished by (1) meticulous choice of laser parameters,32, 34 (2) surgical techniques which aim to spare structures at risk (e.g., avoiding irradiation of the open vestibule,18, 34 and (3) development of purpose-built instruments that help surgeons to handle the laser beam more precisely 5, 32, 35, 36 ( , scanning devices, etc.). Thus, the quality of laser surgery in terms of precision and limitation of possible side effects is largely dependent on the surgeon’s skills, as the dilemma between unwanted thermal effects and pressure transients in laser surgery for the ear remains unsolved. Pulsed laser systems working within the nanosecond to femtosecond range seem to show a way out of this dilemma, as they provide pulses that do not induce high-pressure transients in the perilymphatic fluid and that cause little thermal effects.37, 38, 39 This is a major advantage over earlier, e.g., pulsed laser systems, whose so-called “ultrapulse” mode (Refs. 30, 31, 32) is entirely different from the ultrashort pulsed systems that are now available. Since the required energy for ablation or photodisruption decreases with pulse length,40, 41 side effects such as excess heating of surrounding tissue and disruption by pressure waves can be reduced markedly. The ultrashort pulses emitted by femtosecond lasers result in multiphoton absorption, which creates a plasma field around the target site whose free electrons absorb most of the laser energy. As linear energy absorption by the target tissue itself plays only a minor role, the ablation process depends only weakly on tissue characteristics. Earlier studies performed by Neev on human nail tissue37 demonstrated a better cutting precision of a Ti:sapphire system compared to Er:YAG, Ho:YSGG, and Xe:CL (excimer) lasers, though ablation rates were inferior. Armstrong 38 were the first to use a Ti:sapphire system for ablation of ossicular tissue in human cadaveric bone and obtained an ablation rate of at a repetition rate of . Schwab 39 reported an ablation rate of their Ti:sapphire laser system in relation to varying pulse energy values with a minimal ablation of at . Increased precision is beneficial in stapes surgery, as an exact fit of the prosthesis to the perforation helps to avoid leakage of perilymph from the inner ear. Furthermore, with precise bone ablation it is possible to create microstructures in the ossicular chain, which can accommodate bioactive nanolayers, e.g., for the modulation of cell growth around the prosthesis. We examined the feasibility of a frequency-tripled Nd:YAG laser system at working with nanosecond pulses and compared it to an equally experimental setup of a laser emitting femtosecond pulses at . As a reference, a conventional microscope-coupled single-pulsed Er:YAG laser emitting at was used. The first hypothesis for our considerations is that the optical complexity—and therefore the manufacturing effort—of frequency-tripled Nd:YAG lasers is low compared to ultrafast or femtosecond lasers and a resolution can be achieved with relatively simple transmissive optical elements, which, if compared to more complex femtosecond setups, makes such systems attractive for cost-effective microscope-laser units in middle ear microsurgery. The second hypothesis is that both the nanosecond-pulsed, frequency-tripled Nd:YAG laser, and the femtosecond-pulsed laser, both in conjunction with a scanning system, provide a better ablative precision at little thermal stress and a lower risk of acoustic trauma compared to a manually steered Er:YAG laser system. 2.Material and MethodsWe harvested two human mallei, three inci, and one stapes from two postmortem individuals via an intraauricular approach, exposing the middle ear ossicles while leaving the tympanic membrane intact. In both cases, no sign of chronic inflammation or malformation was found. These ossicles were immersed in 3.5% formaldehyde solution for storage. Principal outcome parameters for each experiment were cutting precision (in micrometers), ablation rate (in micrometers per second), scanning speed (in millimeters per second), and morphological effects on the human ossicular chain. For qualitative evaluation concerning carbonization and denaturation of adjacent bone, light microscopic photographs were taken. The light microscopic focus was used to measure ablation depth in the scanning experiments with an error of , while the focusing error was approximately . In addition, quantitative assessment of carbonization margins in a series of singular pulses as well as in all scanning experiments was performed via environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) in gaseous secondary electron emission (GSE) mode (model XL 30 ESEM FEG, FEI/Philips, Eindhoven, Netherlands). The first laser system consisted of a nanosecond-pulsed, frequency-tripled Nd:YAG laser operating at a 355-nm wavelength (Lambda Physik “Starline,” Göttingen, Germany), with a pulse duration of full width half maximum (FWHM), a pulse repetition rate of , and pulse energy of , resulting in an output power of . The beam was focused by a fixed beam-steering system and a microscope objective to a spot of approximately diameter. Hence the peak fluence in the center of the spot approached . An translation stage was used to move the mallei into an appropriate position. In a first experiment, ablation characteristics of the bony malleus surface in single spots were examined. In the following, this setup is referred to as “THG-1.” In the second experiment, a frequency-tripled Nd:YAG laser with slightly longer pulse duration of FWHM was used (model 210S-355-5000, ILX Lightwave, Bozeman, Montana, USA) and the laser was coupled to a scanner, irradiating four malleus areas of in meandering courses with a repetition rate of (Fig. 1 ). Each site was treated by 28 subsequent courses covering the whole area. The beam diameter in each case was . This setup will be referred to as THG-2. The parameters for the different scans are listed in Table 1 . Table 1Laser parameters for the scanning series performed with setup THG 2.
Both lasers emit in transverse electromagnetic mode with Gaussian intensity distribution and, for convenience, the peak fluence in the center of the spot is taken as a characteristic. For the third experiment, we chose human inci whose structure is comparable to those of the mallei used in experiment THG-1 and THG-2. In this case, a femtosecond-pulsed laser system, consisting of a oscillator and a Colquerite amplifier, emitting at with a bandwidth of FWHM was used. The laser spot was focused to a beam diameter of . Pulse duration was at a repetition rate of and pulse energy of . In that case, the femtosecond-pulsed laser was coupled into a microscope equipped with a motorized stage, which was programmed to irradiate the bony incus surface along the same course as in THG-2 (Fig. 1). The inci were referred to as “fs 2” and “fs 4.” Both were exposed to scanning courses with a beam velocity of in parallel tracks with a mean distance of for a surface, which resulted in an ablation depth of approximately and a scanning time of 40 s/course. The first incus, referred to as fs 2 was exposed to one and three courses respectively, while 10 courses were applied to the incus labeled fs 4. As a reference, a human stapes was exposed to single pulses of a conventional Er:YAG laser, which was coupled to an operating microscope (Zeiss Opmi ORL E, Zeiss Company, Oberkochen, Germany). The Er:YAG laser operates at a wavelength of with a beam diameter of at a fixed microscope focus of , while the pulse duration varies between 50 and , depending on the pulse energy. Exposures were performed as follows: 1 pulse at , 1 pulse at , and a series of 49 singular pulses of each with a total energy of to obtain a perforation of in diameter, which would be required to insert the stapes prosthesis. 3.ResultsFirst, setup and parameter settings THG-1 were used to study the effect of single-spot irradiation when various exposure times were applied to the long malleus process (Fig. 2 ). With a constant beam diameter of , we could observe zones of carbonization, whose width increased with the total exposure time. As there was no coolant applied during these experiments, the findings suggest that excessive heating results in thermal damage, depending on the total energy applied. Prolonging exposure time from 1 to , the overall crater diameter increased from about 30 to , which is considerably wider than the original beam diameter of . The carbonization margin increased from less than width in the 1-s exposure to about in the 10-s exposure. In the 10-s exposure, the full thickness of the malleus process was penetrated. When an exposure time of was chosen (Fig. 3 ), the ablation diameter was reduced to with a superficial conical crater of diameter. With these parameters, a margin of superficial debris with a width of or less was observed. Between adjoining ablation margins, fibrous structures on the surface appeared morphologically intact. Larger areas of approximately size were treated by performing scanning experiments according to setup THG-2. Here, we could observe a debris zone of less than width (Fig. 4 ) adjacent to the ablation crater. Otherwise, scanning electron microscopy revealed no sign of further protein or bone denaturation beyond the debris margin. The crater margins showed a consistent width over all ablated tissue layers. Furthermore, there was mild carbonization at the bottom of the ablated region. Another scan, which was performed at 20% of the power and energy rating of the first, showed no carbonization or collagen denaturation on the bony surface at all, while ablation margins were equally sharp-edged. However, ablation depth was limited while the crater bottom was irregularly shaped. No cooling was used in both experiments. In contrast, scanning experiment no. 4 was performed under superficial application of 0.9% saline solution (Fig. 5 ). A drop of saline solution had been applied to the bone and after diffuse moistening of the surface the scanning started. Although power rating was twice as high as in scan no. 1, there was no sign of thermal damage, only a margin of fibrous tissue layer detached form the malleus process. The ablation depth extended to , which eventually resulted in a full thickness cut through the malleus process. The cutting margin revealed intact Haversian canals with no further signs of bone damage. With the femtosecond-pulsed Laser scans, a singular scan with an ablation depth of (Fig. 6 , right) did not produce any visible debris. In contrast to the low-powered scan no. 2 performed with the frequency-tripled Nd:YAG laser, the base of the ablated area showed a more regular shape. This was also the case with three consecutive scans (Fig. 6, left), while the ablation margins showed some conical shape. However, next to the margins there was a debris zone with a maximum width of . In the series of 10 consecutive scans performed with fs-4 (Fig. 7 ), this debris also had a maximum width of , suggesting that it consists of layers of loose material following photoablation rather than a coagulation zone which would be expected to have an increasing width with longer exposure. Cooling was not performed during any of the femtosecond scans. As expected with the oligothermic ablation properties of the Er:YAG laser, ESEM revealed no visible coagulation in the reference experiment concerning the stapes footplate, while a coagulation zone of very few micrometers cannot be avoided even under optimum ablation conditions. However, given the relatively large beam diameter of , ablation took place in shallow excavations of bony material, as seen with the singular pulses of 10 and (Fig. 8 ). Although saline solution was applied to the stapes footplate at the beginning of the perforation in ablation no. 3, the ablation margins were considerably larger than the actual perforation, which is partially due to the manual steering by means of the micromanipulator, but is also due to a dehydration of the tissue during the laser ablation process, which in turn resulted in a reduced ablation efficiency. Table 2Comparison of laser parameters and results between Armstrong 38 Schwab 39 our study.
4.DiscussionRegarding the morphological findings in these series, it must be taken into account that all ossicles were immersed in 3.5% formaldehyde solution, which results in some alteration in the fibrous tissue layers. As the material had to be stored before setting up the laser experiments, preference was given to fixed material rather than native ossicles. The data suggest that nanosecond-pulsed tissue ablation at a wavelength of does result in mild molecular interaction in terms of protein denaturation or photocoagulation. However, this effect is strongly dependent on the exposure time and relatively minor compared to ablation depth in a single spot which exceeds at least in a 10-s exposure. A marginal carbonization zone of width seems tolerable for microsurgical applications. Coagulation can be further reduced with superficial cooling. In the femtosecond-pulsed laser experiments performed by Armstrong 38 pulses of less than generated photoablation without linear absorption by the target tissue, which is largely due to the shorter exposure time and the characteristics of multiphoton absorption. With respect to ablation speed, Armstrong used a comparatively low pulse rate of . If the pulse rate were raised to , an ablation volume per second of can be obtained. In our experiment we used a pulse repetition rate of while the beam diameter was resulting in an ablation volume of . Although the ablated volume was much smaller, the scanner beam course was not adapted to the specific ablation process and must be optimized further. The findings of the femtosecond ablation series in our study suggest that there is a debris zone, which is most likely due to deposition of bony material following photoablation (Table 2 ). However, the coagulation effects in our nanosecond-pulsed experiments are less than those observed in cw laser systems that emit in the visible light range, i.e., the KTP at and the Argon at or (Refs. 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). Although pressure transients have not been measured as part of this study, the short duration and low energy of pulses could contribute to avoid acoustic trauma to the outer and inner hair cells. Pfander42 reported that the likelihood of acoustic trauma is not only dependent on the magnitude of mechanical impact as expressed in decibels, but also on its duration. The absolute limit of tolerable sound pressure level, irrespective of its duration, is estimated at . As Pratisto 19 pointed out, Erbium:YAG lasers create pulses in the range, with superposed peaks of duration. Although his group as well as Lippert 21 could not demonstrate any detrimental effect on hearing in their experimental and clinical setting, Häusler 20 warned that a temporary hearing threshold shift of 10 and on average did occur postoperatively in patients who had undergone Erbium:YAG laser stapedotomy. Häusler concluded that single pulses of 20 to , corresponding to fluences of 14 to could lead to a temporary threshold shift (TTS) of hearing level and recommended to keep fluences in the range of 10 to . Later studies performed by Keck, 22, 23 which followed these recommendations, did not observe any persistent postoperative sensorineural hearing loss. Superficial cooling has been recognized as relevant for the ablation process, especially in exposure times longer than , and if applied, denaturation of adjacent structure is reduced to or less. Although fluences in our study were set in the range between 10 and , the laser beam diameter and therefore the exposed areas are very small, thus, decreasing the pressure impact on the inner ear as a whole. In addition, the beam diameter of 10 to enhances spatial precision, so that the use of a scanning system is favorable, especially in contrast to ablation with commercially available Er:YAG laser systems for ear surgery, which produce a beam diameter that comes close to the required size of the perforation. Scanners for otologic laser procedures are already commercially available, and with greater precision for the drilling procedure, create a better fit of the stapes prosthesis in the stapes footplate and thus reduce the risk of postoperative perilymph leakage from the inner ear. As in our series, scan velocities of 200 to resulted in superficial to full thickness ablation of the malleus process (about ) within 20 and , respectively, the total operation time at the open inner ear is much less than with manual application of single pulses in one circle (the so-called “rosette” technique). Finally, frequency-tripled Nd:YAG lasers are less complex than ultrafast oscillator-amplifier lasers, easier to build, and require less complicated optical devices to shape laser pulses while preserving the pulse duration characteristics. The currently used laboratory models have a power capability of 10 times the required power and the footprint of the laser head is between and in. When downsizing to the required power level and with further miniaturization, an affordable and rugged operating theater laser unit can be built. ReferencesJ. Sataloff,
“Experimental use of laser in otosclerotic stapes,”
Arch. Otolaryngol., 85 614
–616
(1967). 0003-9977 Google Scholar
T. Palva,
“Argon laser in otosclerosis surgery,”
Acta Oto-Laryngol., 104 153
–157
(1979). 0001-6489 Google Scholar
R. C. Perkins,
“Laser stapedotomy for otosclerosis,”
Laryngoscope, 90 228
–241
(1980). 0023-852X Google Scholar
T. M. McGee,
“The Argon laser in surgery for chronic ear disease and otosclerosis,”
Laryngoscope, 93 1177
–1182
(1983). 0023-852X Google Scholar
J. B. Causse,
S. Gherini, and
K. J. Horn,
“Surgical treatment of stapes fixation by fiberoptic Argon laser stapedotomy with reconstruction of the annular ligament,”
Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am., 26
(3), 395
–415
(1993). 0030-6665 Google Scholar
R. Häusler,
A. Messerli,
V. Romano,
R. Burkhalter,
H. P. Weber, and
H. J. Altermatt,
“Experimental and clinical results of fiberoptic Argon laser stapedotomy,”
Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 253 193
–200
(1996). 0937-4477 Google Scholar
S. G. Lesinski and
A. Palmer,
“Lasers for otosclerosis: vs. Argon and KTP-532,”
Laryngoscope, 99 1
–8
(1989). 0023-852X Google Scholar
S. G. Lesinski and
J. A. Stein,
“Stapedectomy revision with the laser,”
Laryngoscope, 99 13
–19
(1989). 0023-852X Google Scholar
S. Jovanovic,
D. Anft,
U. Schönfeld,
A. Berghaus, and
H. Scherer,
“Animal experimental studies on laser stapedotomy,”
Laryngol., Rhinol., Otol., 74 26
–32
(1995). 0340-1588 Google Scholar
E. Lescanne,
S. Moriniere,
C. Gohler,
A. Manceau,
P. Beutter, and
A. Robier,
“Retrospective case study of carbon dioxide laser stapedotomy with lens-based and mirror-based micromanipulators,”
J. Laryngol. Otol., 117 256
–260
(2003). https://doi.org/10.1258/00222150360600832 0022-2151 Google Scholar
G. Motta and
L. Moscillo,
“Functional results in stapedotomy with and without laser,”
ORL, 64 307
–310
(2002). 0301-1569 Google Scholar
S. G. Lesinski and
R. Newrock,
“Carbon dioxide lasers for otosclerosis,”
Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am., 26
(3), 417
–441
(1993). 0030-6665 Google Scholar
H. Silverstein,
S. Rosenberg, and
R. Jones,
“Small fenestra stapedotomies with and without KTP laser: a comparison,”
Laryngoscope, 99 485
–488
(1989). 0023-852X Google Scholar
L. J. Bartels,
“KTP laser stapedotomy: is it safe?,”
Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg., 103 685
–692
(1990). 0194-5998 Google Scholar
E. M. Michaelides and
J. M. Kartush,
“Implications of sound levels generated by otologic devices,”
Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg., 125 361
–363
(2000). https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2001.118956 0194-5998 Google Scholar
R. Mills,
M. Szymanski, and
E. Abel,
“Delayed facial palsy following laser stapedectomy: in vitro study of facial nerve temperature,”
Clin. Otolaryngol., 28 211
–214
(2003). 0307-7772 Google Scholar
S. G. Lesinski,
“Revision stapedectomy,”
Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., 11 347
–354
(2003) Google Scholar
M. Szymanski,
R. Mills, and
E. Abel,
“Transmission of heat to the vestibule during revision stapes surgery using a KTP laser: an in vitro study,”
J. Laryngol. Otol., 117 349
–352
(2003). https://doi.org/10.1258/002221503321626375 0022-2151 Google Scholar
H. Pratisto,
M. Frenz,
M. Ith,
V. Romano,
M. Felix,
R. Grossenbacher,
H. J. Altermatt, and
H. P. Weber,
“Temperature and pressure effects during Erbium laser stapedotomy,”
Lasers Surg. Med., 18 100
–108
(1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)18:1<100::AID-LSM14>3.0.CO;2-D 0196-8092 Google Scholar
R. Häusler,
P. J. Schär,
H. Pratisto,
H. P. Weber, and
M. Frenz,
“Advantages and dangers of Erbium:YAG laser application in stapedotomy,”
Acta Oto-Laryngol., 119 207
–213
(1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489950181684 0001-6489 Google Scholar
B. M. Lippert,
S. Gottschlich,
C. Külkens,
B. J. Folz,
H. Rudert, and
J. A. Werner,
“Experimental and clinical results of Er:YAG laser stapedotomy,”
Lasers Surg. Med., 28 11
–17
(2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9101(2001)28:1<11::AID-LSM1010>3.0.CO;2-M 0196-8092 Google Scholar
T. Keck,
M. Wiebe,
G. Rettinger, and
H. Riechelmann,
“Safety of the Erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser in stapes surgery in otosclerosis,”
Otol. Neurotol., 23 21
–24
(2002). 1531-7129 Google Scholar
T. Keck,
M. Wiebe,
H. Riechelmann, and
G. Rettinger,
“Results after Erbium:YAG-laser stapedotomy,”
Laryngol., Rhinol., Otol., 82
(3), 157
–161
(2003). 0340-1588 Google Scholar
S. Jovanovic,
U. Schönfeld,
V. Prapavat,
A. Berghaus,
R. Fischer,
H. Scherer, and
G. J. Müller,
“Effects of pulsed laser systems on stapes footplate,”
Lasers Surg. Med., 21 341
–350
(1997). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1997)21:4<341::AID-LSM5>3.0.CO;2-Q 0196-8092 Google Scholar
S. Jovanovic,
Y. Jamali,
D. Anft,
U. Schönfeld,
H. Scherer, and
G. Müller,
“Influence of pulsed laser irradiation on the morphology and function of the guinea pig cochlea,”
Hear. Res., 144 97
–108
(2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00058-7 0378-5955 Google Scholar
M. Kautzky,
A. Trödhan,
M. Susani, and
P. Schenk,
“Infrared laser stapedotomy,”
Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 248 449
–451
(1991). 0937-4477 Google Scholar
D. S. Poe,
“Laser-assisted endoscopic stapedectomy: a prospective study,”
Laryngoscope, 110 1
–37
(2000). https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200005001-00001 0023-852X Google Scholar
B. J. F. Wong,
J. Neev, and
M. J. C. van Gemert,
“Surface temperature distributions in carbon dioxide, Argon, and KTP (Nd:YAG) laser ablated otic capsule and calvarial bone,”
Am. J. Otol., 18 766
–772
(1997). 0192-9763 Google Scholar
C. L. Strunk and
F. B. Quinn,
“Stapedectomy surgery in residency: KTP-532 laser versus Argon laser,”
Am. J. Otol., 14 113
–117
(1993). 0192-9763 Google Scholar
S. Jovanovic,
D. Anft,
U. Schönfeld,
A. Berghaus, and
H. Scherer,
“Influence of laser application to the guinea pig cochlea on compound action potentials,”
Am. J. Otol., 20 166
–173
(1999). 0192-9763 Google Scholar
E. K. Gardner,
J. Dornhoffer, and
S. Ferguson,
“Photoacoustic effects of carbon dioxide lasers in stapes surgery: quantification in a temporal bone model,”
Otol. Neurotol., 23 862
–865
(2002). 1531-7129 Google Scholar
P. Garin,
S. van Prooyen-Keyser, and
J. Jamart,
“Hearing outcome following laser-assisted stapes surgery,”
J. Otolaryngol., 31 31
–34
(2002). 0381-6605 Google Scholar
R. J. Wiet,
D. C. Kubek,
P. Lemberg, and
A. T. Byskosh,
“A meta-analysis review of revision stapes surgery with Argon laser: effectiveness and safety,”
Am. J. Otol., 18 166
–171
(1997). 0192-9763 Google Scholar
C. A. Buchman,
M. J. Fucci,
J. B. Roberson, and
A. De La Cruz,
“Comparison of Argon and laser stapedotomy in primary otosclerosis surgery,”
Am. J. Otol., 21
(4), 227
–230
(2000). 0192-9763 Google Scholar
S. G. Gherini,
K. L. Horn,
C. A. Bowman, and
G. Griffin,
“Small fenestra stapedotomy using a fiberoptic hand-held Argon laser in obliterative otosclerosis,”
Laryngoscope, 100 1276
–1282
(1990). 0023-852X Google Scholar
S. G. Gherini,
K. L. Horn,
J. B. Causse, and
G. R. McArthur,
“Fiberoptic Argon laser stapedotomy: is it safe?,”
Am. J. Otol., 14
(3), 283
–289
(1993). 0192-9763 Google Scholar
J. Neev,
J. S. Nelson,
M. Critelli,
J. L. McCullough,
E. Cheung,
W. A. Carrasco,
A. M. Rubenchik,
L. B. Da Silva,
M. D. Perry, and
B. C. Stuart,
“Ablation of human nail by pulsed lasers,”
Lasers Surg. Med., 21 186
–192
(1997). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1997)21:2<186::AID-LSM10>3.0.CO;2-D 0196-8092 Google Scholar
W. B. Armstrong,
J. A. Neev,
L. B. Da Silva,
A. M. Rubenchik, and
B. C. Stuart,
“Ultrashort pulse laser ossicular ablation and stapedotomy in cadaveric bone,”
Lasers Surg. Med., 30 216
–220
(2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.10034 0196-8092 Google Scholar
B. Schwab,
D. Hanger,
W. Müller,
H. Lubatschowski,
T. Lenarz, and
R. Heermann,
“Bone ablation using ultrashort laser pulses. A new technique for middle ear surgery,”
Laryngol., Rhinol., Otol., 83 219
–225
(2004). 0340-1588 Google Scholar
M. H. Niemz,
“Threshold dependence of laser-induced optical breakdown on pulse duration,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 66
(10), 1181
–1183
(1995). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.113850 0003-6951 Google Scholar
J. Noack,
D. X. Hammer,
G. D. Noojin,
B. A. Rockwell, and
A. Vogel,
“Influence of pulse duration on mechanical effects after laser-induced breakdown in water,”
J. Appl. Phys., 83
(12), 7488
–7495
(1998). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.367512 0021-8979 Google Scholar
S. Pfander, Das Knalltrauma, 56
–80
(1975) Google Scholar
|