When specifying optical surfaces of complex shape, polynomial representation methods are often used. However, if the equation of the curve is not described by a standard polynomial, the approximation error at the edges of such functions increases sharply - this introduces huge oscillations. Freeform surfaces of a complex geometric representation are achieved often as a result of design of beam shapers. Spline methods allow minimizing the effect of oscillations after the surface approximation of the beam shapers. In this paper, a comparative analysis of methods for approximation of freeform surfaces is given using the example of Focal-piShaper synthesis and single collimating lens with one freeform surface. The approximation results for the Focal-piShaper prove the high efficiency of the spline approximation, while in the case of aberration-free collimating lens it is preferable to use polynomial regression.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.