Mr. Muhammad Saqib Hameed Profile

Muhammad Saqib Hameed

at Peking Univ

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (1)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 18 May 2020 Paper

Quantitative damage estimation method based on Lamb waves for transverse damage in composite laminates

M. Saqib Hameed, Zheng Li

Proceedings Volume 11381, 113811R (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2556405

KEYWORDS: Transducers, Composites, Continuous wavelet transforms, Structural health monitoring, Damage detection, Signal processing

Read Abstract +

The effective damage detection does not only require the location of damage but also the size. When a point or circular damage expands in size under stress state, it becomes thin and elongated to transform into a thin rectangular or elliptical slot. The methods introduced in this research use piezoelectric transducers (led zirconate titanate, PZT) to excite and sense the Lamb waves in composite laminate, which are highly sensitive to transverse cracks. The PZT transducers are arranged as a network of cells, and damage is estimated inside each cell separately. The Gabor wavelet-based continuous wavelet transformation (CWT) is used to process the complicated damage-scattered signals. The concept of centroid is used to locate the damage in two stages: the first stage locates the damaged subcell, and then the damage is accurately located in two-stage detection inside the damaged subcell. Based on accurately estimated location, the damage size is calculated using cubic spline curve (CSC) and elliptical parametric (EP) methods. These methods utilize the same arrangement of transducers, and the same data processing technique at all detection stages. The results indicate that EP method could quantify the damage size with more accuracy than the CSC method..

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on SPIE.org.

ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.

Organizational Username

Organizational Password

Show/Hide Password

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years