The RECIST criteria are used in computed tomography (CT) imaging to assess changes in tumour burden induced by cancer therapeutics throughout treatment. One of its requirements is frequent measurement of lesion diameters , which is often time consuming for clinicians. We aimed to study clinician-interactive AI, defined as deep learning models that use image annotations as input to assist in radiological measurements. Two annotation types are compared in their enhancement of predictive capabilities: mouse clicks in the tumour region, and bounding boxes surrounding lesions. The model architectures compared in this study are the U-Net, V-Net, AH-Net, and SegRes-Net. Models were trained and tested using a non-small cell lung cancer dataset from the cancer imaging archive (TCIA) consisting of CT scans and corresponding gold-standard lesion segmentations inferred from PET/CT scans. Mouse clicks and bounding boxes, representing clinician input, were artificially generated. The absolute percent error between predicted and ground truth diameters was computed for each model architecture. Bounding box annotations yielded mean absolute percent errors of 4.9 ± 2.1 %, 7.8 ± 3.4 %, 5.6 ± 2.4 % and 5.6 ± 2.3 %, respectively, whereas models using clicks annotations yielded 17.0 ± 7.9 %, 19.8 ± 9.3 %, 21.4 ± 10.9 % and 18.1 ± 7.9%. The corresponding mean dice scores across all model architectures were 0.883 ± 0.004 and 0.760 ± 0.012 for bounding box and click annotations respectively. Models were then implemented in an AI pipeline for clinical use at the BC cancer agency using the Ascinta software package; click annotations yielded qualitatively better results than bounding box annotations.
Lung Cancer screening trials have demonstrated significant mortality reduction. Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) screening can frequently discover many small nodules in at risk participants. However classification of these, sub-cm nodules as cancerous or benign is a challenging task even for expert clinicians.
We use machine learning (ML) and deep learning (CNN) techniques to differentiate, sub-cm cancerous and benign nodules. Data for this study is drawn from a screening study (PanCan) from which we selected 612 distinct nodules (140 cancerous, and ~size matched 472 benign). Both methods demonstrated a ~80% accuracy, whereas currently used measures (size) had a 68% accuracy.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.