Ms. Amandine Borjon Profile

Amandine Borjon

PhD Student at NXP Semiconductors

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (17)

Proceedings Article | 16 November 2007 Paper

Paper

3D mask modeling with oblique incidence and mask corner rounding effects for the 32nm node

Mazen Saied, Franck Foussadier, Jérôme Belledent, Yorick Trouiller, Isabelle Schanen, Emek Yesilada, Christian Gardin, Jean Christophe Urbani, Frank Sundermann, Frédéric Robert, Christophe Couderc, Florent Vautrin, Laurent LeCam, Gurwan Kerrien, Jonathan Planchot, Catherine Martinelli, Bill Wilkinson, Yves Rody, Amandine Borjon, Nicolo Morgana, Jean-Luc Di-Maria, Vincent Farys

Proceedings Volume 6730, 673050 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.752613

KEYWORDS: Photomasks, Optical proximity correction, 3D modeling, Semiconducting wafers, Diffraction, Scattering, Near field, Lithographic illumination, Systems modeling, Near field optics

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 14 May 2007 Paper

Paper

Characterization of inverse SRAF for active layer trenches on 45-nm node

Jean-Christophe Urbani, Jean-Damien Chapon, Jérôme Belledent, Amandine Borjon, Christophe Couderc, Jean-Luc Di-Maria, Vincent Farys, Franck Foussadier, Christian Gardin, Gurwan Kerrien, Laurent LeCam, Catherine Martinelli, Patrick Montgomery, Nicolo Morgana, Jonathan Planchot, Frédéric Robert, Yves Rody, Mazen Saied, Frank Sundermann, Yorick Trouiller, Florent Vautrin, Bill Wilkinson, Emek Yesilada

Proceedings Volume 6607, 66071C (2007) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.728960

KEYWORDS: SRAF, Optical proximity correction, Printing, Optical lithography, Silicon, Photomasks, Semiconducting wafers, Inspection, Optical simulations, Lithography

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 3 May 2007 Paper

Paper

OPC structures for maskshops qualification for the CMOS65nm and CMOS45nm nodes

Frank Sundermann, Yorick Trouiller, Jean-Christophe Urbani, Christophe Couderc, Jérôme Belledent, Amandine Borjon, Franck Foussadier, Christian Gardin, Laurent LeCam, Yves Rody, Mazen Saied, Emek Yesilada, Catherine Martinelli, Bill Wilkinson, Florent Vautrin, Nicolo Morgana, Frederic Robert, Patrick Montgomery, Gurwan Kerrien, Jonathan Planchot, Vincent Farys, Jean-Luc Di Maria

Proceedings Volume 6533, 65330E (2007) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.736927

KEYWORDS: Optical proximity correction, Reticles, Metals, Photoresist processing, Semiconducting wafers, Critical dimension metrology, Metrology, Manufacturing, Cadmium, Semiconductors

Read Abstract +

Several qualification stages are required for new maskshop tools, first step is done by the maskshop internally. Taking a new writer for example, the maskshop will review the basic factory and site acceptance tests, including CD uniformity, CD linearity, local CD errors and registration errors. The second step is to have dedicated OPC (Optical Proximity Correction) structures from the wafer fab. These dedicated OPC structures will be measured by the maskshop to get a reticle CD metrology trend line. With this trend line, we can: - ensure the stability at reticle level of the maskshop processes - put in place a matching procedure to guarantee the same OPC signature at reticle level in case of any internal maskshop process change or new maskshop evaluation. Changes that require qualification could be process changes for capacity reasons, like introducing a new writer or a new manufacturing line, or for capability reasons, like a new process (new developer tool for example) introduction. Most advanced levels will have dedicated OPC structures. Also dedicated maskshop processes will be monitored with these specific OPC structures. In this paper, we will follow in detail the different reticle CD measurements of dedicated OPC structures for the three advanced logic levels of the 65nm node: poly level, contact level and metal level. The related maskshop's processes are - for poly: eaPSM 193nm with a nega CAR (Chemically Amplified Resist) process for Clear Field L/S (Lines & Space) reticles - for contact: eaPSM 193nm with a posi CAR process for Dark Field Holes reticles - for metal1: eaPSM 193nm with a posi CAR process for Dark Field L/S reticles. For all these structures, CD linearity, CD through pitch, length effects, and pattern density effects will be monitored. To average the metrology errors, the structures are placed twice on the reticle. The first part of this paper will describe the different OPC structures. These OPC structures are close to the DRM (Design Rule Manual) of the dedicated levels to be monitored. The second part of the paper will describe the matching procedure to ensure the same OPC signature at reticle level. We will give an example of an internal maskshop matching exercise, which could be needed when we switched from an already qualified 50 KeV tool to a new 50 KeV tool. The second example is the same matching exercise of our 65nm OPC structures, but with two different maskshops. The last part of the paper will show first results on dedicated OPC structures for the 45nm node.

Proceedings Article | 27 March 2007 Paper

Paper

32-nm SOC printing with double patterning, regular design, and 1.2 NA immersion scanner

Yorick Trouiller, Vincent Farys, Amandine Borjon, Jérôme Belledent, Christophe Couderc, Frank Sundermann, Jean-Christophe Urbani, Yves Rody, Christian Gardin, Jonathan Planchot, Will Conley, Pierre-Jerome Goirand, Scott Warrick, Frédéric Robert, Gurwan Kerrien, Florent Vautrin, Bill Wilkinson, Mazen Saied, Emic Yesilada, Patrick Montgomery, Laurent Le Cam, Catherine Martinelli

Proceedings Volume 6520, 65201D (2007) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.714116

KEYWORDS: Optical lithography, Polarization, Transistors, Double patterning technology, Resolution enhancement technologies, Printing, System on a chip, Logic, Scanners, Optical proximity correction

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 27 March 2007 Paper

Paper

Three-dimensional mask effects and source polarization impact on OPC model accuracy and process window

M. Saied, F. Foussadier, J. Belledent, Y. Trouiller, I. Schanen, C. Gardin, J. C. Urbani, P. K. Montgomery, F. Sundermann, F. Robert, C. Couderc, F. Vautrin, G. Kerrien, J. Planchot, E. Yesilada, C. Martinelli, B. Wilkinson, A. Borjon, L. Le-Cam, J. L. Di-Maria, Y. Rody, N. Morgana, Vincent Farys

Proceedings Volume 6520, 65204Q (2007) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.715120

KEYWORDS: 3D modeling, Photomasks, Optical proximity correction, Polarization, Process modeling, Lithium, Optical lithography, Information technology, Semiconducting wafers, Semiconductors

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 26 March 2007 Paper

Paper

SRAF placement and sizing using inverse lithography technology

Timothy Lin, Frederic Robert, Amandine Borjon, Gordon Russell, Catherine Martinelli, Andrew Moore, Yves Rody

Proceedings Volume 6520, 65202A (2007) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.712369

KEYWORDS: SRAF, Photomasks, Manufacturing, Image quality, Lithography, Diffractive optical elements, Computer simulations, Lithographic illumination, Printing, Optical lithography

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 20 October 2006 Paper

Paper

Sensitivity of a variable threshold model toward process and modeling parameters

Mazen Saied, Franck Foussadier, Yorick Trouiller, Jérôme Belledent, Kevin Lucas, Isabelle Schanen, Amandine Borjon, Christophe Couderc, Christian Gardin, Laurent LeCam, Yves Rody, Frank Sundermann, Jean-Christophe Urbani, Emek Yesilada

Proceedings Volume 6349, 634919 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.686666

KEYWORDS: Calibration, Process modeling, Data modeling, Optical proximity correction, Mathematical modeling, Photoresist processing, Model-based design, Photomasks, Image processing, Image quality

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 21 March 2006 Paper

Paper

Process window OPC verification: dry versus immersion lithography for the 65nm node

Amandine Borjon, Jerome Belledent, Yorick Trouiller, Kevin Lucas, Christophe Couderc, Frank Sundermann, Jean-Christophe Urbani, Yves Rody, Christian Gardin, Frank Foussadier, Patrick Schiavone

Proceedings Volume 6154, 61544D (2006) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.657056

KEYWORDS: Immersion lithography, Lithography, Calibration, Optical proximity correction, Printing, Optical transfer functions, Data modeling, Process modeling, Convolution, Optical lithography

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 14 March 2006 Paper

Paper

Reticle enhancement verification for the 65nm and 45nm nodes

Kevin Lucas, Kyle Patterson, Robert Boone, Corinne Miramond, Amandine Borjon, Jerome Belledent, Olivier Toublan, Jorge Entradas, Yorick Trouiller

Proceedings Volume 6156, 61560R (2006) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.658823

KEYWORDS: Resolution enhancement technologies, Optical proximity correction, Process modeling, Error analysis, Image processing, Semiconducting wafers, Reticles, Optical lithography, Photomasks, Model-based design

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 5 November 2005 Paper

Paper

Through-process window resist modelling strategies for the 65 nm node

Amandine Borjon, Jerôme Belledent, Yorick Trouiller, Kyle Patterson, Kevin Lucas, Christophe Couderc, Frank Sundermann, Jean-Christophe Urbani, Stanislas Baron, Yves Rody, Christian Gardin, Franck Foussadier, Patrick Schiavone

Proceedings Volume 5992, 599219 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.632096

KEYWORDS: Data modeling, Calibration, Statistical modeling, Printing, Critical dimension metrology, Electroluminescence, Convolution, Modeling, Mathematical modeling, Computer simulations

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 5 November 2005 Paper

Paper

Evaluation of transparent etch stop layer phase shift mask patterning and comparison with the single trench undercut approach

Y. Rody, P. Martin, C. Couderc, P. Sixt, C. Gardin, K. Lucas, K. Patterson, C. Miramond-Collet, J. Belledent, R. Boone, A. Borjon, Y. Trouiller

Proceedings Volume 5992, 59920R (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.632561

KEYWORDS: Etching, Optical lithography, Photomasks, Quartz, Phase shifts, Printing, Electroluminescence, Manufacturing, Chromium, Optical proximity correction

Read Abstract +

Despite the complexity of AAPSM patterning using the complementary PSM approach with respect to OPC correction, mask making, fab logistics etc, the technique still remains a valuable solution for special products where a low CD dispersion printing process is required. For current and next generation process technologies (90-65nm ground rules), the most common alternating mask solution of single trench etch with or without undercut becomes more difficult to manufacture. Especially challenging is the aspect ratio control of quartz etched trenches as a function of density in order to assure the correct phase angle and sidewall for dense and isolated structures over all phase shifted geometries. In order to solve this problem, a modified mask architecture is proposed, called the Transparent Etch Stop Layer (TESL) phase shift mask. In TESL, a transparent (etch stop) layer is deposited on the quartz substrate, followed by the deposition of a quartz layer having a thickness corresponding to the required phase angle for the used wavelength. On top a Chromium layer will be deposited. The patterning of this mask will be quite similar to the single trench variant. The difference is, that now an overetch can be applied for the phase definition resulting from the high etch selectivity of quartz to the etch stop material. The result of this approach should be that we can better control the phase depth and sidewall angle for dense and isolated structures. In this paper we will discuss the results of the printing tests performed using TESL masks especially with respect to litho process window, and we will compare these with the single trench undercut approach. Simulation results are presented with respect to shifter sidewall profile and TESL thickness in order to optimize image imbalance. Throughout the study we will correlate simulations and measurements to the after-MBOPC CD values for the shifter structures. These results will allow us to determine if the TESL AAPSM approach can be a more effective alternative to the single trench undercut approach.

Proceedings Article | 28 June 2005 Paper

Paper

Correction of long-range effects applied to the 65-nm node

Jerome Belledent, James Word, Yorick Trouiller, Christophe Couderc, Corinne Miramond, Olivier Toublan, Jean-Damien Chapon, Stanislas Baron, Amandine Borjon, Franck Foussadier, Christian Gardin, Kevin Lucas, Kyle Patterson, Yves Rody, Frank Sundermann, Jean-Christophe Urbani

Proceedings Volume 5853, (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.617433

KEYWORDS: Critical dimension metrology, Etching, Photomasks, Convolution, Optical proximity correction, Electrons, Point spread functions, Optical lithography, Scattering, Light scattering

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 28 June 2005 Paper

Paper

Dual layer patterning failures in complex RET processes using ORC tools and pre- or post-optical proximity correction strategy

Christophe Couderc, Jerome Belledent, Amandine Borjon, Yorick Trouiller, Frank Sundermann, Kevin Lucas, Jean-Christophe Urbani, Franck Foussadier, Yves Rody, Kyle Patterson, Stanislas Baron

Proceedings Volume 5853, (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.617412

KEYWORDS: Optical proximity correction, Resolution enhancement technologies, Multilayers, Optical lithography, Photomasks, Optics manufacturing, Semiconducting wafers, Metals, Manufacturing, Lithography

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 12 May 2005 Paper

Paper

High accuracy 65nm OPC verification: full process window model vs. critical failure ORC

Amandine Borjon, Jerome Belledent, Shumay Shang, Olivier Toublan, Corinne Miramond, Kyle Patterson, Kevin Lucas, Christophe Couderc, Yves Rody, Frank Sundermann, Jean-Christophe Urbani, Stanislas Baron, Yorick Trouiller, Patrick Schiavone

Proceedings Volume 5754, (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.600471

KEYWORDS: Data modeling, Optical proximity correction, Calibration, Printing, Optical lithography, Scanning electron microscopy, Process modeling, 3D modeling, Lithography, Photomasks

Read Abstract +

It is becoming more and more difficult to ensure robust patterning after OPC due to the continuous reduction of layout dimensions and diminishing process windows associated with each successive lithographic generation. Lithographers must guarantee high imaging fidelity throughout the entire range of normal process variations. The techniques of Mask Rule Checking (MRC) and Optical Rule Checking (ORC) have become mandatory tools for ensuring that OPC delivers robust patterning. However the first method relies on geometrical checks and the second one is based on a model built at best process conditions. Thus those techniques do not have the ability to address all potential printing errors throughout the process window (PW). To address this issue, a technique known as Critical Failure ORC (CFORC) was introduced that uses optical parameters from aerial image simulations. In CFORC, a numerical model is used to correlate these optical parameters with experimental data taken throughout the process window to predict printing errors. This method has proven its efficiency for detecting potential printing issues through the entire process window [1]. However this analytical method is based on optical parameters extracted via an optical model built at single process conditions. It is reasonable to expect that a verification method involving optical models built from several points throughout PW would provide more accurate predictions of printing errors for complex features. To verify this approach, compact optical models similar to those used for standard OPC were built and calibrated with experimental data measured at the PW limits. This model is then applied to various test patterns to predict potential printing errors. In this paper, a comparison between these two approaches is presented for the poly layer at 65 nm node patterning. Examples of specific failure predictions obtained separately with the two techniques are compared with experimental results. The details of implementing these two techniques on full product layouts are also included in this study.

Proceedings Article | 5 May 2005 Paper

Paper

Improving model-based OPC performance for the 65-nm node through calibration set optimization

Kyle Patterson, Yorick Trouiller, Kevin Lucas, Jerome Belledent, Amandine Borjon, Yves Rody, Christophe Couderc, Frank Sundermann, Jean-Christophe Urbani, Stanislas Baron

Proceedings Volume 5756, (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.601166

KEYWORDS: Calibration, Data modeling, Optical proximity correction, Statistical modeling, Performance modeling, Model-based design, Photoresist materials, Printing, Coastal modeling, Optimization (mathematics)

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 5 May 2005 Paper

Paper

65nm OPC and design optimization by using simple electrical transistor simulation

Yorick Trouiller, Thierry Devoivre, Jerome Belledent, Franck Foussadier, Amandine Borjon, Kyle Patterson, Kevin Lucas, Christophe Couderc, Frank Sundermann, Jean-Christophe Urbani, Stanislas Baron, Yves Rody, Jean-Damien Chapon, Franck Arnaud, Jorge Entradas

Proceedings Volume 5756, (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.600887

KEYWORDS: Transistors, Ions, Optical proximity correction, Lithography, Optical lithography, Lithium, Logic, Photomasks, Lithographic illumination, Manufacturing

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 5 May 2005 Paper

Paper

Investigation of model-based physical design restrictions

Kevin Lucas, Stanislas Baron, Jerome Belledent, Robert Boone, Amandine Borjon, Christophe Couderc, Kyle Patterson, Lionel Riviere-Cazaux, Yves Rody, Frank Sundermann, Olivier Toublan, Yorick Trouiller, Jean-Christophe Urbani, Karl Wimmer

Proceedings Volume 5756, (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.601105

KEYWORDS: Model-based design, Optical proximity correction, Optical lithography, Data modeling, Lithography, Systems modeling, Semiconductors, Resolution enhancement technologies, Reticles, Semiconducting wafers

Read Abstract +

Showing 5 of 17 publications

SIGN IN TO:

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Advertisement

Advertisement