Mr. Dusty Leonhard Profile

Dusty Leonhard

at Applied Materials Inc

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (2)

Proceedings Article | 16 October 2017 Presentation

EUV Infrastructure: EUV photomask backside cleaning (Conference Presentation)

Bruce Fender, Dusty Leonhard, Hugo Breuer, Jack Stoof, My-Phung Van, Rudy J. Pellens, Reinout Dekkers, Jan-Pieter Kuijten

Proceedings Volume 10450, 1045009 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2280387

KEYWORDS: Photomasks, Extreme ultraviolet, Reticles, Pellicles, Scanners, Contamination, Inspection, Extreme ultraviolet lithography, Reflectivity, Oxygen

Read Abstract +

EUV Infrastructure: EUV photomask backside cleaning Applied Materials as first author: Bruce J. Fender, Dusty Leonhard, Hugo Breuer, Jack Stoof ASML: My Phung Van, Rudy Pellens, Reinout Dekkers, Jan Pieter Kuijten Due to electrostatic chucking of the backside of EUV masks, backside cleanliness in EUV lithography is an important factor. Contamination on the backside can cause damage to reticle (e-chuck), cross-contaminate to the scanner or cause local distortions in the reticle. Cleaning of the masks offers a solution to reduce the defectivity level on reticles. However, repeated cleaning on masks is known to have an impact on absorber, CD and reflectivity. Ideally, cleaning should occur without any alterations to the critical features on the front side of the mask. With the introduction of pellicles for EUV, there could be an additional drive for backside-only cleaning. In this work the GuardianTM Technology is introduced that enables backside cleaning without any cleaning impact on the reticle front side through a protective seal at the outer edge of the mask. The seal protects the front side during the backside clean. The cleaning process encompasses a single-sided pre-clean oxygen plasma treatment of the mask surface, followed by sonic cleaning, and ending with a rinse and dry step. Separating the mask backside from front side enables: • Backside cleaning without any cleaning impact on features on the mask front side. • The isolation allows an aggressive cleaning of the backside to ensure defect removal. • Processing of reticle with studs on the front side. This prevents unnecessary actions of stud removal and removal of the remaining glue after stud removal and subsequent gluing of the studs after cleaning. Just before chucking of a reticle, the defectivity level on the mask is initially inspected with an in-scanner reticle backside inspection tool. The GuardianTM cleaning process is able to remove the vast majority of the cleanable defects that could impact scanner performance. Post GuardianTM clean interferometric microscope defect review reveals the remaining defects > 25-μm-PSL are ~78% are indent/damage and 11% are defects with insignificant height to impact scanner performance or cleanliness.

Proceedings Article | 19 March 2015 Paper

EUV mask cleans comparison of frontside and dual-sided concurrent cleaning

Lin Lee Cheong, Louis Kindt, Christina Turley, Dusty Leonhard, John Boyle, Chris Robinson, Jed Rankin, Daniel Corliss

Proceedings Volume 9422, 94221M (2015) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2085913

KEYWORDS: Photomasks, Ruthenium, Particles, Extreme ultraviolet, Reflectivity, Surface roughness, Extreme ultraviolet lithography, Scanners, EUV optics, Pellicles

Read Abstract +

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years